Tuesday, November 25, 2014

BIRTH OF CHRIST’S MYSTICAL BODY - Easter Sunday (Cycle A)

Homily for Easter Sunday (Cycle A)
Based on Jn 20:1-9 (Gospel), Ac10:34a, 37-43 (First Reading) and Col 3:1-4 (Second Reading)
From the Series: “Reflections and Teachings of the Desert”

BIRTH OF CHRIST’S MYSTICAL BODY
 ‘When Christ your life appears, then you too will appear with him in glory’ (Col 3:1-4)

The Gospel narrative for this Easter Sunday (Cycle A) is taken from Jn 20:1-9. Verse 1 says: It was very early on the first day of the weeka and still dark, when Mary of Magdala came to the tomb. She saw that the stone had been moved away from the tomb. Footnote a says “This was to become ‘the Lord’s Day’, the Christian Sunday; cf. Rv. 1:10.”

Parallel texts are:
1.       Mt 28:1-8 - After the sabbath,a  And towards dawn on the first day of the week, Mary of Magdala and the other Maryb went to visit the sepulcher (v. 1). And all at once there was a violent earthquake, for an angel of the Lord, descending from heaven, came and rolled away the stone and sat on it (v. 2). His face was like lightning, his robe white as snow (v. 3).  The guards were so shaken, so frightened of him, that they were like dead men (v. 4).  But the angel spoke; and he said to the women, “There is no need for you to be afraid. I know you are looking for Jesus, who was crucified (v. 5). He is not here, for he has risen just, as he said he would. Come and see the place where hec lay(v.6), then go quickly and tell his disciples, ‘He has risen from the dead, and now he is going before you to Galilee; it is there you will see him.’ Now I have told you (v.7)”  Filled with awe and great joy the women came quickly away from the tombd and ran to tell the disciples (v. 8), Footnotea  says “And not ‘On the Sabbath evening’ (Vulg.) Since the Sabbath was the day of rest, ‘the first day of the (Jewish) week’ corresponds to our Sunday (Rv 1:10), ‘dies dominica’, or ‘the day of the Lord’ so named in memory of the resurrection. Cf. Ac 20:7+; 1 Co 16:2.”; Footnote b  says “‘Mary of James’, Mk 16:1; Lk 24:10; cf. Mt 27:56 and 61.”; Footnote says “‘he’; var. ‘the Lord’.”; and Footnote d says “Var. ‘came quickly out of the tomb’. Cf. Mk 16:8.”
2.       Mk. 16:1-8 - When the sabbath was over, Mary Magdala, Mary, the mother of James, and Salome bought spices with which to go and anoint him (v. 1). And very early in the morning  on the first day of the week they went to the tomb, just as the sun was risinga (v. 2). They  had been saying to one another, “Who will roll away the stone for us from the entrance to the tomb?”  (v. 3). But when they looked they could see that the stone-which was very big - had already been rolled back (v. 4). On entering the tomb they saw a young man  in a white robe seated on the right-hand side, and they were struck with amazement (v. 5). But he said to them, “There is no need for alarm. You are looking for Jesus of Nazareth, who was crucified: he has risen, he is not here. See here is the place where they laid him (v. 6). But you must go and tell his disciples and Peter, ‘He is going before you to Galilee; it is there you will see him, just as he told you (v. 7)’.” And the women came out and ran away from the tomb, because they were frightened out of their wits; and they said nothing to a soul,b for they were afraid…(v. 8). Footnote a say “Var. ‘when the sun had risen’.”; Footnote b  says “According to Mt 28:8; Lk 24:10,22f; Jn 20:18, they did in fact tell the news. Mark, too, may have said so in a loss ending of his gospel (cf. following note); alternatively, he may have deliberately refrained from speaking of it to avoid having to append an account of the apparitions which he has made up his mind to omit.”

3.       Lk. 24:1-11 - On the first day of the week, at  the first sign of dawn, they  went to the tomb with the spices they had prepared (v. 1). They found that the stone had been rolled away from the tomb (v. 2), but on entering discovered that the body of the Lord Jesus was not there (v. 3). As they stood there not knowing what to think, two men in brilliant clothed suddenly appeared at their side (v. 4). Terrified,  the women lowered their eyes. But the two men said to them, “Why look  among the dead for someone who is alive? (v. 5).He is not here, he has risen. Remember what he told you while he was still in Galilee:a (v. 6), that the Son of Man had to be handed over into the power of sinful men and be crucified, and rise again on the third day (v. 7)”And they remembered his words (v. 8). When the women returned from the tomb they told all this to the Eleven and to all the others (v. 9)  The women were Mary of Magdala, Joanna, and Mary the mother of James. The other women with them also told  the apostles (v. 10), but this story of theirs seemed pure nonsense, and they did not believe them (v. 11). Footnote a  says “Lk does not intend to speak of the Galilean apparitions; he therefore modifies Mk 18:7, just as earlier he omitted Mk 14:28.”
4.       Mt. 28:10 - Then Jesus said to them, ‘Do not be afraid: go and tell my brothers that they must leave for Galilee; they will see me there’.e Footnote e says “Though they agree in recording the initial apparition of the angel (or angels) to the women (Mt. 28:5-7; Mk 16:5-7; Lk. 24:5-7; Jn 20:12-13), the four gospels show divergences when it comes to the appearances of Christ. Setting Mark aside (his abrupt conclusions presents a special problem, cf. Mk. 16:8+, and his ‘longer ending’ recapitulates the data of the other gospels) all the gospels make a clear distinction, both literary and doctrinal, between; 1. Appearances to individuals that help to prove the fact of the resurrection; to Mary Magdalen, either alone (Jn 20:14-17; cf. Mk 16:9), or accompanied (Mt 28:9-10); to the disciples on the road to Emaus (Lk. 24:13-32;  cf. Mk. 16:12), to Simon (Lk 24:34), to Thomas (Jn 20:26-29). 2. A collective appearance that is coupled with an apostolic mission (Mt. 28:16-20; Lk. 24:36-49; Jn 20:19-23; cf.  Mk 16:14-18). As well as this distinction there two traditions as to where the appearances took place: 1. All in Galilee (Mk. 16:7; Mt 28:10,16-20); 2. All in Judea (Lk and Jn 20). By way of appendix, Jn 21 adds an appearance in Galilee which though it bears the character of an appearance to individuals (it is for Peter and John predominantly) is nevertheless coupled with an apostolic mission (given to Peter). The primitive apostolic preaching that Paul reproduces in 1 Co 15:3-7 lists 5 appearances (apart from the appearance to Paul himself) which are not easily harmonized with the gospel accounts; in particular he mentions an appearance to James of which the Gospel to the Hebrews also speaks. All this gives the impression that different groups, which cannot now be easily identified, have given rise to the different strands of tradition. But these very divergences of tradition are far better witnesses that any artificial or contrived uniformity to the antiquity of evidence and the historical quality of all these manifestations of the risen Christ.”

Verses 2 to 5 says: And came running to Simon Peter and the other disciple, the one Jesus loved. “They have taken the Lord out of the tomb,’ she said ‘and we don’t know where they put him.” So Peter set out with the other disciple to go to the tomb. They ran together, but the other disciple running faster than Peter reached the tomb first; he bent down and saw the linen cloths lying on the ground, but did not go in.b Footnote b says “The disciple acknowledges that Peter has some title of precedence. Cf. 21:15-17.”

Parallel texts for verse 2 are:
1.       Jn 13:22-23 - The disciples looked at one another, wondering which he meant. The disciple Jesus loved was reclining next to Jesus.
2.       Jn 18:15 - Simon Peter, with another disciple, followed Jesus. This disciple, who was known to the high priest, went with Jesus into the high priest’s palace.
Verse 6 says: Simon Peter, who was following  came up, went right into the tomb, saw the linen cloths on the ground.

Parallel text fot verse 6 is Lk 24:12 that says: bPeter, however, went running to the tomb. He bent down and saw the binding cloths but nothing else; he then went back home, amazed at what had happened.
Footnote b says “Om. v. 12.”

Verse 7 says: and also the cloth that had been over his head; this was not with the linen cloth but rolled up in a place by itself.

Parallel texts are:
1.       Jn 11:44 - The dead man came out, his feet and hands bound with bands of stuff and a cloth round his face, Jesus said to them, ‘Unbind him, let him go free’.
2.       Jn 19:40 - They took the body of Jesus and wrapped it with the spices in linen cloths, following the Jewish burial custom.

Verse 8 says: Then the other disciple who had reached the tomb first also went in; he saw and he believed.

Parallel text is Jn 21:7 that says: The disciple Jesus loved said to Peter, ‘It is the Lord’. At this word ‘It is the Lord’, Simon Peter, who had practically nothing on, wrapped his cloak round him and jumped into the water.

Verse 9 says: Till this moment they had failed to understand the teaching of the scripture,c that he must rise from the dead. Footnote c says “Cf. Ps 16:8-11; 2:7; Ac 2:24-31; 13:32-37; 1 Co 15:4.”

Parallel texts are:
1.       Jn 5:39 - You study the scriptures, believing that in them you have eternal life, now these same scriptures testify to me, and yet you refuse to come to me for life!
2.       Jn 14:26 - But the Advocate, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name, will teach you everything and remind you of all I have said to you.r Footnote r– says “In place of the departed Christ, the faithful will have the Spirit, 14:16,17; 16:7; cf. 1:33+; He is the Paracletos, who intercedes with the Father cf. 1 Jn. 2:1, and whose voice is heard in human courts, 15:26,27, cf. LK. 12:11p., Mt. 10:19-20p. Ac. 5:32. He is the Spirit of truth, leading men to the very fullness of truth, 16:33, teaching them to understand the mystery of Christ – fulfillment of the scriptures, 5:39+, the meaning of his words, 2:19+, of his actions, and his ‘signs’, 14:26, 16:13, 1 Jn. 2:20f,27, all hitherto obscure to the disciples, 2:22, 12:16, 13:7, 20:9. In this way the Spirit is to bear witness to Christ, 15:26, 1 Jn. 5:6,7, and shame the unbelieving world, 16:8-11.”


The First Reading is from Ac10:34a, 37-43 under the title “Peter’s address in the house of Cornelius.”

Verses 34a and 37 say:  Then Peter addressed them: You must have heard about the recent happenings in Judaea,k about Jesus of Nazareth and how he began in Galilee, after John had been preaching baptism.l Footnote k  says “Vv. 37-42 sums up the gospel story, cf. 1:21-22; 2:22+, emphasizing the same points as Luke brought out in his own gospel”; and Footnote  l says “Lit. ‘Jesus from Nazareth, how he began (var. ‘how it (all) began’) in Galilee after the baptism proclaimed by John’.


Parallel text for verse 37 is  Lk. 4:44+ says: And he continued his preaching in the synagogues of Judaea.l Footnote l says “Mk reads ‘Galilee’. Lk uses ‘Judaea’ in the wide sense: the land of Israel. So also in 7:17; 23:5 (?); Ac. 10:37; 28:21.”

Verse 38 says: God has anointed him with the Holy Spirit and with power, and because God was with him, Jesus went about doing good and curing all who had fallen into the power of the devil.

Parallel texts are:
1.       Ac 1:8 - But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit comes on youi and then you will be my witnessesj not only in Jerusalem but throughout Judaea and Samaria, and indeed to the ends of the earth’.k Footnote i  says  “The Holy Spirit is a favorite theme of Luke (Lk 4:1+); he talks mostly about the Holy Spirit as a Power, Lk 1:35; 24:49;Ac 1:8;10:38; Rm 15:13,19; 1 Co 2:4,5; 1 Th 1:5; Heb 2:4, sent  from God by Christ, Ac 2:38, to broadcast the Good News. 1. The Spirit gives the charismata, 1 Co 12:4f, that guarantee the message; the gift of tongues, Ac 2:4+, of miracles, 10:38, of prophecy, 11:27+; 20:23; 21:11, of wisdom, 6:3,5,10:2, the Spirit fives strength to proclaim Jesus as Messiah in spite of persecution 4:8,31; 5:32; 6:10;cf. Ph 1;19 and to bear witness to him, Mt. 10;20p; Jn 15:26; Ac 1:8; 2 Tm 1:7f,cf. following note; 3. The Spirit guides the Church in her major decisions: the  admission of pagans, Ac 8:29,40; 10:19,44-47; 11;12-16; 15:8, without obligation to observe the  Law, 15:28; Paul’s mission to the pagan worlds, 13:2f; 16:6-7; 19:1 (Western Text) cf. Mt. 3:16+,Ac also mentions the Spirit  as received in baptism and forgiving sins, 2:38, cf. Rm 5:5+.”; Footnote j  says “The primary functions of the apostles is to bear witness: not only to Christ’s resurrection, Lk. 24:48, Ac 2:32, 3:15, 4:33, 3:32, 24:48,13;31, 22:15, but also to the whole of is public life, Lk 1:21, Jn 15:27, Ac. 1:22, 10:39f.”; and Footnote k says “nothing can limit the apostolic mission.”
2.       Ac 4:27  - ‘This is what has come true: in this very city Herod and Pontius Pilatei made an alliance with the pagan nations and the peoples of Israel, against your holy servant Jesus whom you anointed.j  Footnote h says “‘Anointed’ ; the Greek word is ‘Christ’; it is explained here, v. 27. According to its etymological sense.”; Footnote i  says “Representing respectively the ‘kings’ and ‘princes’ the Psalm mentions. For ‘Herod’, cf. Lk. 23:6-16.”; Footnote j  says “The ‘anointing’ that has constituted him King Messiah, ‘the Christ’, cf. Mt. 3:16+.”
3.       Is. 61:1 - The Spirit of the Lord Yahweh has been given to me, for Yahweh has anointed me. He has sent me to bring good news to the poor, to bind up hearts that are broken; to proclaim liberty to captives, freedom to those in prison…
4.       Mt. 3:16 - As soon as Jesus was baptized he came up from the water, and suddenly the heavens openedl and he saw the Spirit of God descending like a dove and coming down on him.m Footnote l  says “Add ‘for him’, i.e. before his eyes.”;  and Footnote m says “The Spirit which hovered over the waters at the first creation (Gn 1:2) now appears at the beginning of the new creation. It has two functions; it anoints Jesus for his messianic mission (Ac 10:38) which it is guide (Mt 4:1 p; Lk4:14,18: 10:21; Mt 12:18,28), and, according to the patristic view, it sanctifies the water, thus preparing the way for Christian baptism, cf. Ac 1:5+.”
5.       Ac. 2:22 - Men of Israel, listen to what I am going to say;n Jesus of Nazareth was a man commended to you by God by the miracles and portents and signs that God worked through him when he was among you, as you all know. Footnote n  says “The content of the earliest apostolic preaching (the ‘kerygma’) is here summarized for the first time; cf. the five discourses of Peter, Ac. 2:14-39, 3:12-26; 4:8-12, 5:29-32, 10:34-43, and the discourse of Paul. 13:16-41. The kerygma is 1. a witness, 1:8+, to Christ’s death and resurrection, 2:24+, and to his exaltation, 2:33+; 2:36+, 2. It also provides certain details of Christ’s ministry; how it was heralded by John the Baptist, 10:37, 13:24, inaugurated by teaching and miracle, 2:22, 10:38, completed by the appearances of the risen Christ, 10:40,41, 13:31, and by the gift of the Spirit, 2:33, 5:32. 3. It places this story in its wider setting: it appeals to the past, adducing the OT prophecies, 2:23+; 2:35+, and it surveys the future, the advent of the messianic era, inviting Jews and pagans to repentance, 2:38+, so that Christ’s glorious return may come the sooner, 3:20-21. The gospels, which are development of the primitive preaching, adopt the same theme.”
6.       Mt. 8:29 - They stood there shouting, ‘What do you want with us, Son of God? Have you come here to torture us before the time?’j Footnote j  says “Until the day of Judgment, the demons are to some extent free to work their mischief on earth, Rv. 9:5; they do this normally by taking possession of men, 12:43-45+. Such possession brings disease with it because disease- consequence of sin, 9:2+- is another manifestation of Satan’s dominion, Lk. 13:16. It is for this reason that the gospel exorcism though sometimes described simply as expulsions, cf. 15:21-28p; Mk. 1:23-28p; Lk. 8:2, often take the form of cures, 9:32-34; 12:22-24p; 17:14-18p; Lk. 13:10-17. By his power over the devils Jesus destroys Satan’s empire, 12:28p; Lk. 10:17-19; cf. Lk.4:6; Jn. 12:31+, and inaugurates the messianic era of which, according to the prophets, the gift of the Holy Spirit is the distinctive mark, Is. 11:2+; Jl. 3:1f. Man may refuse to recognize it, 12:24-32, but the demons see it all too well, cf. this passage and Mk. 1:24p; 3:11p; Lk. 4:41;Ac. 16:17; 19:15. This power to exorcise is given by Jesus to his disciples simultaneously with the power of miraculous healing, 10:18p, with which it is connected, 8:3+; 4:24; 8:16p; Lk. 13:32.”

Verse 39 says: Now, I, and those with me, can witness to everything he did throughout the countryside of Judea and in Jerusalem itself; and also to the fact that they killed him by hanging him on a tree,

Parallel text is that says: But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit comes on you.i and then you will be my witnessesj not only in Jerusalem but throughout Judaea and Samaria, and indeed to the ends of the earth’.k(1:8) ‘…someone who was with us right from the time when John was baptizing until the day when he was taken up from us- and he can act as a witness to his resurrection.’ (v. 22). Footnote i  says “The Holy Spirit is a favorite theme of Luke (Lk 4:1+); he talks mostly about the Holy Spirit as a Power, Lk 1:35; 24:49;Ac 1:8;10:38; Rm 15:13,19; 1 Co 2:4,5; 1 Th 1:5; Heb 2:4, sent  from God by Christ, Ac 2:38, to broadcast the Good News. 1. The Spirit gives the charismata, 1 Co 12:4f, that guarantee the message; the gift of tongues, Ac 2:4+, of miracles, 10:38, of prophecy, 11:27+; 20:23; 21:11, of wisdom, 6:3,5,10:2, the Spirit fives strength to proclaim Jesus as Messiah in spite of persecution 4:8,31; 5:32; 6:10;cf. Ph 1;19 and to bear witness to him, Mt. 10;20p; Jn 15:26; Ac 1:8; 2 Tm 1:7f,cf. following note; 3. The Spirit guides the Church in her major decisions: the  admission of pagans, Ac 8:29,40; 10:19,44-47; 11;12-16; 15:8, without obligation to observe the  Law, 15:28; Paul’s mission to the pagan worlds, 13:2f; 16:6-7; 19:1 (Western Text) cf. Mt. 3:16+,Ac also mentions the Spirit  as received in baptism and forgiving sins, 2:38, cf. Rm 5:5+.”; Footnote j  says “The primary functions of the apostles is to bear witness: not only to Christ’s resurrection, Lk. 24:48, Ac 2:32, 3:15, 4:33, 3:32, 24:48,13;31, 22:15, but also to the whole of is public life, Lk 1:21, Jn 15:27, Ac. 1:22, 10:39f.”; and Footnote k says “nothing can limit the apostolic mission.

Verse 40 says: Yet three days afterwards God raised him to lifem and allowed him to be seen. Footnote m  says “Lit. ‘raised him on the third day’; stereotyped formula of the Christian preaching and faith. It appears as early in 1 Co. 15:4 (a first stage of the creed) with the addition ‘according to the scriptures’. The formula echoes Jon 2:1 (cf. Mt 12:40); see also Ho. 6:2. It occurs in Mt 16:21; 17:23; 20:19; 27:64; Lk. 9:22; 18:33; 24:7,46”

Parallel text is Ac 2:23 that says:  This man, who was put into your power by the deliberate intentiono and foreknowledge of God, you took and had crucified by men outside the Law.p You killed him, but God raised him to life, freeing him from the pangs of Hades;q Footnote o says “The OT prophecies demonstrate this divine plan: Ac 3:18; 4:28; 13:29; cf. 8:32-35; 9:22; 10:43; 17:2-3; 18:5,28; 26:22-23,27; 28:23; Lk 18:31+; 22:22; 24:25-27,44.”; Footnote p says “In this case, the Romans. The primitive kerygma accused the Jews is the same way, and confronted them with that act of God whish raised up Jesus, 2:32,36; 3:13-17; 4:10; 5:30-31; 7:52; 10:39-40; 13:27-30; 17:31; Mt. 16:18+.”; and Footnote q  says “‘of Hades’ Western Text; ‘of death’ Text. Rec. Cf vv. 27 and 31. ‘Hades’ in LXX is Sheol, Nb 16:33+; Mt 16:18+.”

Verse 41 says: not by the whole people by only by certain witnesses God had chosen beforehand. Now we are those witnesses – we have eaten and drunk with himn after his resurrection from the dead. Footnote n  says “Add (West.) ‘and were his companions for forty days after his resurrection from the dead.’”

Parallel texts are:
1.       Ac 1:3-4 - He had shown himself alive to them after his Passion by many demonstrations: for forty days he had continued to appear to them and tell them about the Kingdom of God.d When he had been at table with them, he told them not to leave Jerusalem, but to wait there for what the Father had promised. Footnote d  says “The kingdom of God, Mt 4:27+, must be the main subject preached by the apostles, cf Ac 8:12, 19:8; 20:25; 28:23,31, as it was the main thing preached by Christ, cf. Mt 3:2+.”
2.       Jn 14:22 - Judas - this was not Judas Iscariot - said to him, ‘Lord, what is all this about? Do you intend to show yourself to us and not to the world?’
3.       Lk. 24:41-43 - Their joy was so great that they still could not believe it, and they stood there dumbfounded; so he said to them, ‘Have you anything to eat?’ And they offered him a piece of grilled fish, which he took and ate before their eyes.
4.       Ac. 13:31 - And for many days he appeared to those who had accompanied him from Galilee to Jerusalem and it is these same companions of his who are now his witnesses before our people.

Verse 42 says: And he has ordered us to proclaim this to his peopleo and to tell them that God had appointed him to judge everyone, alive or dead.p Footnote o  says “I.e. the Chosen People, Israel, 10:2; 21:28.”; and Footnote p  says “Those still alive at the glorious coming and those who have died before the coming but then rise for judgment. See 1 Th 4:13-5:10. By raising up Jesus, God has solemnly invested him as supreme Judge, Ac 17:31; Jn. 5:22,27; 2 Tm 4:1; 1 P 4:5; to proclaim the resurrection is therefore to invite men to repentance, Ac. 17:30-31.”

Parallel text is Ac 2:36 that says: For this reason the whole House of Israel can be certain that God has made this Jesus whom you crucified both Lord and Christ.v Footnote v says “Conclusion of the argument from scripture. It is by his resurrection that Jesus has been constituted the ‘Lord’ of whom Ps 110 speaks, and the ‘Messiah” (Christ) to whom Ps 16 refers. From Ps. 2:7 (Son of God), Ac 13:33+; Heb. 1:5; 5:5; Rom. 1:4+ develop a similar argument. Cf. also Ac 5:31 (leader and savior); 10:42 and Rom 14:9 (Judgeand Lord of the living and dead); Ph. 2:9-11 (glorified Lord).

Verse 43 says: It is to him that all the prophets bear witness: that all who believes in Jesus will have their sins forgiven though his name.

Parallel texts are:
1.       Ac 2:23 - This man, who was put into your power by the deliberate intentiono and foreknowledge of God, you took and had crucified by men outside the Law.p Footnote o  says “The OT prophecies demonstrate this divine plan: Ac 3:18; 4:28; 13:29; cf. 8:32-35; 9:22; 10:43; 17:2-3; 18:5,28; 26:22-23,27; 28:23; Lk18:31+; 22:22; 24:25-27,44.”; Footnote p  says “In this case, the Romans. The primitive kerygma accused the Jews is the same way, and confronted them with that act of God whish raised up Jesus, 2:32,36; 3:13-17; 4:10; 5:30-31; 7:52; 10:39-40; 13:27-30; 17:31; Mt. 16:18+.”
2.       Ac 2:38  - ‘You must repent’ Peter answered ‘and every one of you must be baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus Christx for the forgiveness of your sins, and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. Footnote x says  “Baptism is administered ‘in the name of Jesus Christ’ (cf.1.5+) and the recipient ‘invokes the name of the Lord Jesus’ (cf. 2:21+; 3:16+): 8:16;10:48;19:5;22:16; 1Co 1:13,15; 6:11; 10:2; Ga 3:27; Rm 6:3;cf. Jm 2:7. Such expressions are not necessarily the actual liturgical formulae of baptism, cf. Mt 28:19, they may simply indicate its significance, namely, that the baptized profess their faith in Christ, and Christ adopts those who thenceforth are dedicated to him.”
3.       Ac 3:16 - And it is the name of Jesus which, through our faith in it, has brought back the strength of this man whom you see here and who is well known to you. It is faith in that name that has restored this man to health, as you can all see.j Footnote j says “The ‘name’ according to the ancients, is inseparable from the person and shares his prerogatives, see Ex. 3:14+. By invoking the name of Jesus, 2:21+, 38+, his power is stirred to action, 3:6, 4:7, 10:30, 10:43, 16:18, 19:13, LK. 9:49, 10:17, se also Jn. 14:13,14, 15:16, 16:24,26; 20:31. Faith is of course required if this invocation is to be effective, cf. Ac. 19:13-17, Mt. 8:10+.”

The Second Reading is Col 3:1-4.

Verses 1 and 2 say: Since you have been brought back to the true life with Christ, you must look for the things that are in heaven, where Christ is sitting at God’s right hand. Let your thoughts be on heavenly things, not on the things that are on the earth…

Parallel texts are:
1.       Ep. 2:6 - And raised us up with him and gave us a place with him in heaven, in Christ Jesus. e Footnote e  says “Here as in Col. 2:12, 3:1-4, the use of the past tense shows that the resurrection and triumph of Christians in heaven is considered as actually existing whereas the future tense in Rom. 6:3-11, 8:11,17f treats it as something that has still to take place. Treating the eschatological reality as already existing is a characteristic of Paul’s letters written from prison.”
2.       Ph 3:20 - For us, our homeland is in heaven, and from heaven comes the savior we are waiting for, the Lord Jesus Christ.
3.       Ac 2:33 - Now raised to the heights by God’s right hand,s he has received from the Father the Holy Spirit, who was promised, t and what you see and hear is the outpouring of the Spirit. Footnote  s  says “Words borrowed from Ps. 118 (v. 16 LXX ‘ The right hand of the Lord has raised me up’) used in their preaching by the apostles who took it to be messianic: Ac. 4:11, 1 P. 2:7, Mt. 21:9p,42, 23:39, LK. 13:35, Jn. 12:13, Heb. 13:6. But it is possible to translate “Having been raised up to the right hand of God and to see in this an introduction to the quotation (v. 34) of Ps. 110), which is another theme of apostolic preaching: Mt. 22:44p., 26:64p., Mk. 16:19, Ac. 7:55,56, Rm. 8:34, 1 Co. 15: 25, Ep. 1:20, Col. 3:3, Heb. 1:3,33, 8:1, 10:12, 12:2, 1 P. 3:22.”; and Footnote t says “According to the prophets, the gif of the Spirit would characterize  the messianic era, Ex. 36:27+. Peter explains the miracle his bearers have witnessed as the ‘pouring out’ of this spirit, foretold in Jl 3:1-2 by the risen Christ.”
Verse 3 says: because you have died, and now the life you have is hidden with Christ in God.

Parallel texts are:
1.       Col 2:12 - You have been buried with him, when you were baptized, and by baptism, too, you have been raised up with him through your belief in the power of God who raised him from the dead.
2.       Ph. 1:21 - Life to me, of course, is Christ, but then death would bring me something more.

Verse 4 says: But when Christ is revealed – and he is you’re a life – you too will be revealed in all your glory with him. b Footnote a says “Var. ‘our’.”; and Footnote b  says “Through union with Christ in baptism, 2:12, his followers already live the identical life he lives in heaven, cf. Ep 2:6+, but this spiritual life is not manifest and glorious  as it will be in the parousia.”

Parallel texts are:
1.       Col. 1:27 - It was God’s purpose to reveal it to them and to show all the rich glory of this mystery to pagans. The mystery is Christ among you, your hope of glory:n Footnote n  says “Previously, when it had seemed (to the Jews) that pagans could never be saved, as salvation was restricted to ‘Israel’, pagans had seemed to be without a Messiah and consequently to be deprived of all hope, Ep. 2:12. The ‘mystery’ or secret of God that had now been revealed was that the pagans too were, and had been, all called to be saved through union with Christ, and so to reach eternal glory , cf. Ep. 2:13-22; 3:3-6.”
2.       1 P. 5:1 - Now I have something to tell you elders:a I am an elder myself, and a witnessb to the sufferings of Christ. and with you I have a share in the glory  that is to be revealed. Footnote a says “These elders are to be identified with the ‘presbyters’ of Tt. 1:5+; cf. note on 5:5 where ‘elders’ means older people.”; and Footnote b  says “This can mean either that as an apostle, 1:1, he witnessed the Passion of Jesus, or that through his own sufferings he is a witness to Christ.”
3.       1 Jn 3:2 - My dear people, we are already the children of God but what we are to be in the future has not yet been revealed; all we know is, that when it is revealed we shall be like him because we shall see him as he truly is.
4.       Rm. 8:19 - The whole creation is eagerly waiting for God to reveal his sons.k Footnote k says “Lit. ‘ waiting for the revelation of the sons of God’. The material world, created for man, shares his destiny. It was cursed for man’s sin, Gen. 3:17, and is therefore now deformed: impotent and decadent, vv. 19-22. But like man’s body, destined to be glorified, it too is to be redeemed, vv. 21-23; it will share the glorious liberty of the children of God, v. 21. For the Greek philosopher matter was evil and the spirit must be delivered from it; Christianity regards matter as itself enslaved and to be set free. In other texts also salvation is extended to creatures (especially angels) other than men, cf. Col. 1:20; Ep. 1:10; 2 P. 3:13; Rv. 21:1-5.”

Homily:

Regarding our position that that there was a spiritual resurrection more than a bodily resurrection that occurred in the resurrection of Jesus Christ, which is the birth of His Mystical Body - the Church- as is asserted by scriptures, we presently quote the doctrine stated in my earlier work “Pag-adal sa Biblia Bilang 16, Nabuhay-Liwat Daw Man Naggad Si Jesukristo Sa Pagkagadan?” (dated 25 April 1998) and also David C. Pack’s article “Christ’s Resurrection Was Not on Sunday” concerning the Christian celebration of Easter thus:

“An mga pruweba na makukua sa Bbliya: Enot, an Aparisyon kan anghel sa bakanteng lolobngan. An mga report kan apat na ebanghelista siring kaini:



An ikaduwang pruweba: an Aparisyon ni Jesus.  Magkaiba an mga report ni Markos (16:9-20) asin ni Pablo (1 Co. 15:3-8):
A.      Aparisyon sa mga indibidwal:
1.       Ki Maria Magdalena - (a) Jn. 20:14-17; (b) Mk. 16:9; (c) Mt. 28:9-10 – Duman sinabat sinda ni Jesus; An mga babae nagrani asin nagdarapa, kinugos an bitis niyae.
2.       Sa duwang disipulo sa tinampo pa-Emmaus – (a) Lk. 24:13-35 (Hilnga an v. 16d – Para sa kondisyon kan hawak na mamurawayon, hilnga an 1 Co. 15:44+; (b) Mk. 16:12 – Ipinahiling an sadiri sa ibang porma.
3.       Simon Pedro – (a) Lk. 24:34, 1 Co. 15:5 (Cephas); (b) Jn. 21 (Simon asin Juan).
4.       Tomas – Jn. 20:24-29.
B.      Aparisyon sa enterong grupo: Mt. 28:16-20; Mk. 16: 14-18; Lk. 24:36-49; Jn. 20:19-23.
C.      An apat na ebanghelista dai man uruyon kun saen nangyari an aparisyon na ini ni Jesus: sa Galilea (sosog sa Mt. 28:10, 16-20; Mk. 16:7); gabos sa Judea o Jerusalem (sosog ki Lk. 24 18, 47, 52; Gibo 1:8; Jn. 20:19) asin Jn. 21 – sa Dagat nin Tiberias.

Sa duwang pruweba biblikal na ini dapit sa resureksyon ni Jesus, an mga report kan mga nagsasabing sinda saksi dapit sa pagbangon ni Jesus sa mgagadan dai nagkakauruyon, dai nagkakasurubo0, asin an saindang mga datos nagbabaranggaan asin nagkukurontrahan. Kawasa ta an mga kagsurat kan ebanghelio nadedepisilan na ika-eksplikar kun ano talaga an kahulugan kan ‘resureksyon.’ Mas marhay talaga na an mga estoryang makukua sa bibliya dapit sa resureksyon ni Jesus dai magkauruyon, dai maglasurubo asin magbarangggan o magkuruntrahan, tanganing ining tunay na kahulugan kan ‘resureksyon’ tagoon sa mga parabasa kan bibliya dai maniningong makaintiyende, asin tangani padagos magin masakit tubudon an doktrina kan resulreksyon nin kadaklan na tawo nin huli ta an mga estorya ninda nasa pormang alegoría o parábola (mga estoryang sa tunay na buhay dai man nangyari kundi isinasaysay tanganing ikapaabot an sarong kahulugan, o mensahe, o katotoohan, o doktrina, o katukdoan). Kun kaya an mga datos na irinireport sa mga estorya kan pagbangon ni Jesus sa pagkagadan (resureksyon) na isinasaysay kan mga ebanghelista dai uruyon, dai surubo, o nagbabanggaan nin huli ta an intensyon ninda bako man talagang pag-report nin sarong insidenteng tunay na nangyari (na iyo an sarong gadan na tawo nabuhay-liwat sa pagkagadan) sa totoong buhay kundi ipaabot o isabi ninda ining sarong biblikal na katukdoan dapit sa kamugtakan nin tawo pagkatapus na siya Magadan (an resureksyon). Ining mga estorya igwang hararom na kahulugan asin itinatago kan para-estorya sa sarong dai nanggad makatutubod na estoryang depisil masabotan o tubodon.
An katotoohan dapit sa estorya kan resureksyon ni Jesus iyo ini: an tataramon na’resureksyon’ sa tataramon na Griyego ‘anastasis’ (hilnga Gibo 17:18k, na iyo man an ginikanan kan Griyegong tataramon na ‘anastesai’ na an kahulugan ‘pagrestorar,’ ‘restaurar,’ o pagbalik o pagsulit (Hilnga Job 19:25-27 asin komentaryo h). An tema kan gabos na profeta sa AT iyo an restorasyon (Zec. 9:11-17, An Mesias asin an Restorasyon nin Israel; Is. 60 , An mamurawayon na resureksyon kan Jerusalem; Ezk. 37:1-14, “Luminaog sainda an hinangos, nabuhay sinda liwat asin tuminirindog, sarong dakula asin mahibog na hukbod. Boot kong bangonon kamo sa saindong lolobngan, banwaan ko, asin darhon kamo pabalik sa daga ni Israel’; Daniel 12:2-3, ‘Dangan sa mga kasusupgan, na an iba sa daing kasagkoran na buhay. An mga may inadalan (Hilnga 11:35) makintab na maliwanagon siring sa baul nin kalangitan, asin idtong nagtutukdong katanosan sa kadaklan maliwanag siring sa mga bitoon sa gabos na daing tapos na panahond; Siring mana n Libro nin Karangahan ni Jeremias, 30 asin 31, 33; Bar. 5:1-9; Ho. 2:16-17; 3:5, 11:10, 12:10; 14:2-9; Joel 4:1; Amos 9:14-15; Micah 7:11-12. Sa mga libro nin Kadonongan 3:1-9, 4:7-5:24 asin mga Salmo 16:10+, 49:15, 104:29-30 makukua an temang resureksyon-restorasyon. Para sa mga profeta, an pagbalik kan Israel hale sa pagkadesterro pasiring sa Dagang Panuga iyo an dakulang restorasyon na gigibuhon nin Dios para sa saiyang banwaan, siring kan pagpabalik niya kaidto kan mga aki ni Jacob hale sa daga nin kaoripnan asin kagadanan, an Ehipto, ilinuwas niya sinda pasiring sa desierto sagkod sa Dagang Panuga sa Dakulang Exodo. Ginibo naman ini nin Dios sa panahon pa ni Abraham. An gabos na pagbabalik na ini pasiring sa dagang itinao nin Dios, iyo an manipestasyon kan saiyang intensyon na ikabalik an tawo sa saiyang dating kinamugtakan nin Dios saiya, an Parasio kan Eden, na pinierde kan enot na mga tawo huli sa kasalan. Sa lugar na ni ni Paraiso, an tawo nabubuhay sa sarong hawak nin liwanag, sarong mamurawayon asin malinig na hawak (body of light o astral body) namayong iba kundi tubig na alen sa hawak na laman (dalipay). Alagad kan siya magsuhay sa Dios, pinalayas siya sa Paraiso asin tinawan nin Dios nin bagong gubing, an hawak na laman (anit sa Gn. 3:21) na hawak na malalapaon (1 Co. 15:42-43) na may kagadanan (Col. 2:23, Jn. 6:27, Rm. 7:5). Alagad kan si Jesus Magadan para sa kasalan nin tawo, an saiyang diosnon na kamugtakan ibinalik nin Dios saiya (Ph. 2:6-11) huli kan pagbangon nin Dios saiya sa pagkagadan (Ph. 2:9) asin pagsakat sa langit. Ini an kahulugan kan ‘resureksyon’ ni Jesus: an saiyang pagbalik (restorasyon) sa dati niyang kinamumugtakan antes siya magsalaman nin tawo. Kun siring, huli kan restorasyon-resureksyon na ini ni Jesus, ibinabalik nin Dios sa tawo an posibilidad na makabalik man giraray siya sa dati niyang kinamumugtakan antes na magkasala si Adan, an Paraiso, asin isagubing liwat an hawak nin liwanag, o astral body.
An doktrinang ini malinaw na makukua sa BT: dapit sa diosnon na kamugtakan ni Jesus – Ph. 2:6-11), asin an saiyang pagsalaman – 1 Tm. 3:16; an pagbalik kan saiyang dati o orihinal na kinamumugtakan – Col. 2:11) bilang hawak nin liwanag o mamurawayon na hawak – 2 Co. 5:1-5. Dapit sa resureksyon nin tawo – 1 Co. 15:44+, 2 Mc. 7:9-14+, 12:38, 43-46, Mt. 22:29-30 (Hilnga 1:7+, Rm. 2:6, Rm. 1:4+, Gibo 1:6-7, 2 P. 3:12, Gibo 3:20-21o, Jr. 15:19, Rm. 8:11, 1 Th. 4:14-18, 1 Co. 6:14, 1 Co. 15:20, 2 Co. 4:14, 16-17, 2 Co. 5:1-10, 2 Co. 13:4, Rm. 6:5-11, Ep. 2:6e, 2 Tm. 2:8-11, Heb. 9:23-28, 1 P. 3:18-22, 4:1-6.
Kun siring, sa pagkagadan nin tawo kaipuhan na baklason niya an hawak na laman (Col. 2:11, 3:1-4) asin ibalik in isa daga tanganing malapa (1 Co. 15:42-43). An babangunon sa pagkagadan iyo an hawak nin liwanag na iyo an tubig, an yaon nang dati sa tawo alagad kaidto binadoan nin laman (2 Co. 10:3-5, Col. 3:9-14, 2 Co. 5:1-10). Dapit sa hawak nin liwanag, Hilnga Dan. 12:3, Kad. 3:7); an hawak nin liwanag iyo an tubig, an elementong isinalak nin Dios sa dalipay tanganing magpormang tawo n asa paghayop niya kan saiyang hinangos nagin buhay na linalang (Gn. 1:2, 2:7). Kun siring, tanganing mabuhay an tawo sosog sa kagustuhan nin Dios, kaipuhan niyang pakakanon an hawak nin liwanag kan kakanon na langitnon, Kad. 16:20. Kaipuhan na linigon mana n hawak na laman tanganing an hawak nin liwanag (tubig) iyo an mabuhay (Tal. 25:4, Kad. 3:5).  Kun siring, an bautismo, sa paagi nin paglugbo satubig iyo an saklamento (tanda) na an tawo minalinig kan saiyang hawak na daganon sa paggi nin pakikisumaro sa kagadanan ni Cristo ( Gal. 2:19-21, Col. 2:12) tanganing an nalinigan na hawak na laman magdan sa irarom kan tubig asin an magbutwa iyo an nalinigan na hawak na mamurawayon o maliwanagon na iyo si Cristo mismo (Ph. 3:21, Col. 3:1-4). An masakat sa langit iyo an hawak nin liwanag na ini (Apo. 11:11-12, 20:4). Dapit sa “Universal Restoration”, hilnga an Gibo 3:21, 7:55-56, Sal. 122:3, 126:2ª, Jr. 16:14-15.
                Dapit sa satong hawak nin liwanag na yo an tubig, ini kaya an dahelan kun tano ta si Jesus nagsabi sa Jn. 6:27 “Dai kamo magpagal para sa kakanon na nalalapa kundi magpagal kamo para sa kakanon na minadanay sagkod sa buhay na daiing kasagkoran.” Ining kakanon na nalalapa iyo an kakanon para sa awak na laman. An kakanon para sa buhay na daing kasagkoran iyo an kaknaon para sa hawak nin liwanag na sinabi man ni Jesus sa LK. 10:41 “Marta, marta, naghahadit asin nasisibot k asa dakul na bagay, alagad kadikit sana an kaipuhan, an totoo satro lang.” An sarong bagay na ini na kaipuhan nin tawo tanganing mabuhay iyo an tubig, na iyo an kakanon para sa hawak nin liwanag o mamurawayon nin huli ta an hawak na ini tubig man sana. Dangan masabi kamo, “mayong siram an buhay kun puro tubig sana an tutumaron nin tawo.” An simbag: ‘Dai man kaya kita linalang nin Dios para magpasiram-siram. Hapot: “Tadaw ta linalang pan in Dios an siram kun dai t aman palan pakikinabanagn?” Simbag: “Ginibo nin Dios an siram para duman sa mga tawong boot niyang mapierde para sa buhay na daing kasagkoran. Ini an dahela kun tano ta mahalaga an ‘ayuno’, ta sa pag-aayuno tinutukdoan kitang mabuhay sa tubog sana ma iyo an pinakakakanon na mahalaga para sa tubig tang hawak.
Christ’s Resurrection Was NOT on Sunday
by David C. Pack
Did Jesus rise from the grave on Sunday morning? Had He been there for three days and three nights? He said this was the only sign (Matt. 12:40) that He was the Messiah! Does—can—this sign coincide with the tradition of a Good Fridaycrucifixion near sunset and a sunrise resurrection on Easter Sunday?
What proof did Christ offer that He was the Messiah? The Pharisees challenged Him on this very point and He gave them an answer—His sign that He was true: “An evil and adulterous generation seeks after a sign; and there shall no sign be given to it, but the sign of the prophet Jonas: For as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale’s belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth” (Matt. 12:39-40).
How, then, does the “Good Friday-Easter Sunday” tradition fit? Can 72 hours (three days and three nights) be made to fit into a period between late day Friday and early Sunday morning? Why do so few even seem to question this only sign that Christ said He would give that He was the Messiah? Could He have been wrong on this single great proof of who He was and still have been the Messiah?
Since no one directly witnessed His Resurrection, we must examine the only available authority on this great event—your Bible! The apostle Paul said to “Prove all things; hold fast that which is good” (I Thes. 5:21). The Bible is the revealed Word of God. It is His written revelation to mankind. Prepare to be shocked at what the Bible does and does not say on this vital point!
While professing Christians willingly accept the common traditions of men, true disciples (learners, students) of Christ want to know what HE says. Christ warned, “In vain do they worship Me teaching for doctrines the commandments of men. For laying aside the commandment of God, you hold the tradition of men” (Mark 7:7-8).
What standard will you use? Will you accept the recorded facts of history found in God’s Word—or continue with the familiar, comfortable traditions of men?
The Tremendous Importance of His Sign
Is it any surprise that Satan the devil would want to deny that Christ was the Messiah? Is it any surprise that he would seek to relegate the story of Jonah and the “whale” to folklore, myth, symbolism and superstition? If this miracle never occurred, then Christ’s sign, based entirely upon it, is nothing more than hollow and pointless allegory.
Consider what is at stake in Jesus’ statement in Matthew 12:39-40. Jesus placed His ENTIRE IDENTITY on the line with His sign. If He failed His only sign, then He is not our Savior and nothing He said can be trusted. In effect, if His prophecy of this sign failed, then He must be considered a false prophet. He would be a fraud and should not be followed—and MANKIND HAS NO SAVIOR!
Do not confuse the fact of the resurrection’s occurrence as being the sign, with the question of “how long”—the precise length of time—He would be in the grave before His resurrection took place. This was the test of His sign.
Be under no illusion about the position of Bible critics—sometimes known as “higher critics.” While it is embarrassing to watch them try to explain away Christ’s only sign, they really have no choice. If Christ’s sign remains intact, the Good Friday-Easter Sunday tradition would be exposed as groundless—false—and collapse in a heap!
Some Bible commentaries nearly leave one breathless in astonishment when they assert that three days and three nights, in the Greek language, can actually mean three periods of time—either day or night. Friday night, Saturday daylight and Saturday night are portrayed as these three “periods” of time.
At least some are honest enough to acknowledge that the Friday-Sunday tradition is, in fact, only about half the length of time that Christ said He would be in the grave.
What Are Days and Nights?
Can we know for certain or must we speculate on the meaning—the definition—of a day or the meaning of a night? Does the Bible leave this definition open to opinion—with one man’s opinion as good as another?
Jonah 1:17 plainly says, “And Jonah was in the belly of the fish three days and three nights.” The Old Testament was written in Hebrew. Here, scholars face a dilemma when they explore the phrase “three days and three nights.” Some of these same “scholars”—who are actually critics—acknowledge that the Hebrew language must mean a 72-hour period of time. There is no room for any “periods of time” theories in the Hebrew.
Here is the problem! Christ said His time in the grave would be “as Jonah was three days and three nights in the great fish’s belly…” The word “as” sets the standard of comparison. It leaves no room to “negotiate” the meaning of the Greek. The margin of Jonah 2:2 even compares Jonah’s time in the “great fish” to “the grave.” In this verse, the Hebrew word translated “hell” is Sheol. It literally means “the grave.” The comparison of Christ to Jonah—in a grave—becomes complete.
Did Christ understand the length of a “day” or the length of a “night”? He did! In John 11:9-10, He asked, “Are there not TWELVE HOURS in a day?…But if a man walk in the night, he stumbles.”
The Bible mentions in several places that Christ rose “the third day.” How long was this? The first half of the creation chapter, in Genesis 1:4-13, plainly says that God “divided the light from darkness. And God called the light Day and the darkness He called Night. And the evening [darkness] and the morning [light] were the first day…And the evening [darkness] and the morning [light] were the second day…And the evening [now THREE periods of darkness called night—three nights] and the morning [now THREE periods of light called day—three days] were the third day.”
This is the Bible’s definition of the length of time accounted for within the phrase “the third day.” It spanned three periods of darkness and three periods of light. We have proven that each of these periods is twelve hours. Six times twelve hours equals 72 hours! What could be more plain?
The Source of the Problem
We have now established the exact duration of Christ’s time in the tomb as a 72-hour period. He was there for three days and three nights “as Jonah was…” We will shortly examine four additional scriptures that prove the same thing.
In Mark 7:13, Christ strongly warns against “making the word of God of none effect through your tradition.” How is it that intelligent, well-educated Bible scholars seem to “know” that Jesus was crucified on Friday and resurrected on Sunday? What is it about Christ’s clear, straightforward sign that they cannot accept? The answer lies in the comfort of long-held but clearly FALSE traditions!
One of the most important rules of Bible study is to gather all of the scriptures on a subject to get the complete picture of that subject. There are other scriptures that prove the 72-hour duration of Christ’s time in the tomb.
John 2:19-21 states, “Jesus answered and said unto them, Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up…But He spoke of the temple of His body.” Clearly, the use of the phrase “in three days” means that Christ’s time in the tomb could not exceed 72 hours—or it would not be within the three-day period.
Conversely, Matthew 27:63 establishes Jesus’ time in the tomb as not less than three days, or 72 hours, for it says, “After three days I will rise again.”
Examining two additional verses in Mark’s gospel account prove the same parameters of John 2 and Matthew 27. Notice Mark 8:31: “And He began to teach them, that the Son of man must suffer many things, and be rejected of the elders, and of the chief priests, and scribes, and be killed, and after three days rise again.” A late Friday afternoon entombment means a late Monday afternoon resurrection. It is as simple as counting one, two, three! Finally, in reference to this verse, if it stood alone without other scriptures to qualify it—it must be plainly admitted that Christ’s use of the word “after” does not, by itself, limit His time in the tomb to 72 hours. He could still be there longer. He just could not be there one bit less than 72 hours. This much should now be clear.
We are now ready for Mark 9:31: “They shall kill Him; and after that He is killed, He shall rise the third day.” This verse presents another limitation on Christ’s time in the tomb. Consider! This verse, if taken by itself, places His time in the grave between 48 and 72 hours. The phrase “the third day” caps the duration at 72 hours—but it also creates a minimum of 48 hours—or the period would be somewhere in the second day! Again, if this verse is to be taken alone, a Friday afternoon crucifixion requires a resurrection sometime after late Sunday afternoon and no later than late Monday afternoon.
Establishing the Time of the Resurrection
The following fact should be clear. The exact moment and time of day when Christ was placed in the tomb had to coincide with the exact time of day of His Resurrection. We must establish precisely when Christ was placed in the tomb. We will then know precisely when He left the tomb. Plainly, any time of day or night—morning, noon, afternoon, evening, midnight, etc.—that Christ would have entered the tomb would have to be the very same time He would depart it by His resurrection!
While on the stake, after “the ninth hour” (three o’clock in the afternoon), Jesus “cried out” (Matt. 27:46-50; Mark 15:34-37; Luke 23:44-46) and died. Luke 23:44 also makes a reference to “the sixth hour, and there was darkness in all the earth until the ninth hour.” The sixth hour is six hours after sunrise—or noon! This would make the ninth hour three o’clock.
These events occurred on the day before “the Sabbath”—the day called “the preparation” (Matt. 27:62; Mark 15:42; Luke 23:54). We should recognize that the Bible counts days as the period from evening to evening (Lev. 23:32) or sunset to sunset. Recall Genesis 1: “…the evening [night or darkness] and the morning [day or light]…”
John 19:42 explains, “There laid they Jesus therefore because of the Jews’ preparation day.” Jewish burial law (vs. 31) forbade the bodies of the dead remaining unburied at the outset of any Sabbath day or feast day. Remember, Luke 23:46 explained that Christ died at, or shortly after, three o’clock in the afternoon. He would have been buried soon thereafter—prior to sunset.
We have not yet established the day of the week that the crucifixion  occurred. However, our previous computation and comparison of related scriptures reveals that Christ must have risen sometime after three o’clock in the afternoon—on whatever would have been the day that was three days later.
A brief summary is in order at this point. Again, Christ’s Messiahship is at stake. Based on when He was buried (sometime between three and six o’clock on the day of His crucifixion), His sign as our Messiah was that He must—I repeat He must—rise at the same time 72 hours later. Otherwise, He is an impostor and a fraud, and we have no Savior. Unless we wish to make “the word of God of none effect through [our] tradition,” we must now admit that a popular, great tradition has crashed in a heap of rubble. Some honest questions remain.
The Crucifixion Preceded a Sabbath—But Which Sabbath?
We have now reached the important issue of when to start counting the 72-hour period of Christ’s sign. It involves the Sabbath. But which Sabbath? Could this question lie at the heart of why people assume a Friday crucifixion? We have already proven from all four Gospels that the day of Christ’s crucifixion was called “the preparation.” John 19:14 explains “it was the preparation of the Passover.” However, verse 31 goes further by stating, “for that sabbath day was an high day.” What does this mean?
What is a Sabbath that is a high day?
Any Jew will tell you that a “high day” is a FEAST DAY or an ANNUAL HOLY DAY! Leviticus 23 describes seven of these days that the nation of ancient Israel was commanded to keep year by year. A simple review of this chapter (verses 24, 26-32 and 39) reveals that God considered these days to be Sabbaths. Notice that Leviticus 23:2 refers to all of these Sabbaths as “the feasts of the LORD” and “even these are myfeasts.” This same verse also calls them “holy convocations”—meaning commanded assemblies. These days do not fall on the same day, year after year, any more than do the common pagan holidays that most people observe today.
Matthew 26:2 states, “You know that after two days is the feast of the passover, and the Son of man is betrayed to be crucified.” (Leviticus 23 shows that the Passover was the one feast that was not also a Sabbath, wherein work was prohibited.) There is no doubt that Christ was crucified on the Passover. (Read our free booklet How Often Should the Lord’s Supper Be Taken?)
The original Passover is described in Exodus 12. A lamb was slain and the blood of this lamb was struck over the doorposts of all the Israelite houses. It was this blood that caused the death angel to pass over any particular house, thus saving the firstborn of that house from death! Hence, the term “passover.”
The Old Testament Passover always preceded the annual Sabbath called the first Day of Unleavened Bread. This day was a high day or a feast day to be celebrated each year, again, on the day immediately following the Passover. Notice Numbers 28:16-17: “And in the fourteenth day of the first month is thepassover of the LORD. And in the fifteenth day of this month is the feast.” This feast was the first Day of Unleavened Bread.
Jesus Christ was slain by crucifixion on the exact same day that the Passover lamb had been slain every year. While the above referenced booklet will take the reader into greater detail on this point, suffice to say that I Corinthians 5:7 plainly states, “Christ our passover is sacrificed for us.” John the Baptist called Christ “the Lamb of God, which takes away the sin of the world” (John 1:29). Christ was crucified on the Passover and this day then would automatically be a preparation day for the feast day, or annual high day Sabbath—which was to begin almost immediately after His burial.
As mentioned, annual Sabbaths could occur on any day of the week. Tuesday and Thursday are more common than any other day for the first Day of Unleavened Bread, following the Passover. Thursday is probably the most common of all. For instance, in the thirty-six years (counting inclusively) between 1998 and 2033, the first Day of Unleavened Bread occurs on a Thursday 12 times, and on a  Tuesday 10 times. All other days are less often during this period. In the year of Christ’s crucifixion, according to the Hebrew calendar, the Passover occurred on a Wednesday! This means that the annual Sabbath had to be one day later—or Thursday! It was, in fact, THIS SABBATH that was approaching, thus requiring the swift burial of Jesus’ body prior to its arrival. The weekly Sabbath, or Saturday, was to occur two days after that.
Which Was the Day of the Resurrection?
If Christ’s Resurrection was not on Sunday, then when was it? The world commonly believes that it was Sunday morning. Does the Bible say this, or have millions made an assumption?
John 20:1 says, “The first day of the week comes Mary Magdalene early, when it was yet dark, unto the sepulchre, and sees the stone taken away from the sepulchre.” Compare this verse with Mark 16:2 andLuke 24:1.
It is now very early Sunday morning (it is still dark) and the tomb is open. Do these verses supply the supposed proof for the Sunday resurrection tradition? Do they support “Easter sunrise services”? A problem already presents itself. Christ is gone from the tomb before sunrise!
Now notice Luke 24:6. Mary Magdalene, and the others with her, are described as finding two angels standing before them. These angels stated plainly to these women, “He is not here, but is risen.” Also see Mark 16:6 and Matthew 28:5-6.
Christ was GONE—He was already risen! Notice the past tense of the two angels’ statement.
We can now establish the day of Christ’s resurrection. We have already established the time of day of His death and the burial soon thereafter and, therefore, also the time of His resurrection. It was late afternoon, between 3 and 6 p.m. Obviously, Christ was already risen, by this time, in the darkness of Sunday morning—because He had been gone from the grave since late afternoon on SATURDAY! Let us state this plainly. Christ died on the late afternoon of a Wednesday Passover and was resurrected three days later on the late afternoon of the very next Saturday.
Thus, the resurrection did not even occur on Sunday—period!

Christ’s Sign Fulfilled
Who will you believe? Will it be theologians, scholars, higher critics and other traditionalists, who love to profess Jesus, but reject the sign that He gave? Or will you believe the words of your Bible—that Jesus Christ rose from the dead exactly as He said He would?
It is now time to read a different Gospel account of the two angels’ statement to the women at the tomb. This time notice Matthew 28:6. It states, “He is not here: for He is risen, as He said.” This would be impossible if Christ had been in the grave one second more or one second less than 72 hours. The One who said, “Are there not twelve hours in a day?” was well aware of exactly how long His sign required that He remain in the “belly of the earth”—the grave.
Not only did Christ state that He would fulfill His sign but it was also established by the mouth of two witnesses (Deut. 17:6; 19:15), who happened to be mighty angels of God.
Paul adds a final, great, corroborating proof that Christ did spend three entire days and three entire nights—from late Wednesday afternoon until late Saturday afternoon—in the tomb. In I Corinthians 15:3-4, Paul validates the words of Christ and the two angels who witnessed His fulfillment. Notice: “For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; And that He was buried, and that He rose again THE THIRD DAY according to the scriptures.”
Further, the prophet Daniel gave a prophecy he described as “seventy weeks” (Dan. 9:24-27). In this prophecy, the Messiah was foretold to be cut off “in the midst of the week.” Wednesday is literally the fourth, or middle day, of a seven-day week. So then, it was in the “midst of the week” that Christ was “cut off.” (It should be noted that this prophecy in Daniel was a foretelling of Christ also being “cut off” in the midst of His ministry—after 3 1/2 years [Fall A.D. 27 to Spring A.D. 31]—if the biblical application of “a day for a year” is properly applied to the seventieth week of that prophecy.)

Are There Other Questions for Examination?
Some will say, “But what about this scripture or what about that scripture or this point or some other point?” Are there other questions that should be examined?
Some ask about Mark 16:9. Certain people suppose that this verse proves the Sunday resurrection theory. Does it? Simply reading the verse makes plain that it does not say Christ “was rising” but rather He “was risen” from the grave. Take time to read the verse. It uses past tense because, as we have seen, Christ had been gone from the grave for about twelve hours (since late Saturday afternoon) by this time on Sunday morning.

But what about Luke 24:21? It states, “…and beside all this, today is the third day since these things were done.” The phrase “these things” is a reference to all the events related to the crucifixion.Verses 18-20 describe the particulars of “these things” to be Christ’s delivery to Pilate, His trial, His crucifixion, His beating, His death, up to the setting of the seal and the watch over His tomb, which occurred the following day—Thursday. This discussion occurred on Sunday, and Sunday was the third day since all of “these things” were completed (on Thursday) with the setting of the watch on Christ’s tomb. Therefore, this is not a verse which can be used to set aside everything that all of the other scriptures on this subject have proven.

A Final Proof
Matthew 28:1 contains an important statement that bears examination before this subject can be laid to rest. Notice that this verse begins with the phrase “In the end of the sabbath.” Most versions render it this way, but some use the phrase “After the Sabbath.” The Ferrar Fenton translation correctly renders this phrase. Fenton translates this phrase with “after the Sabbaths” (plural). Fenton is possibly the only translator to note that the original Greek has the word “SABBATHS” in the plural. This is important. We will see why.
Notice Mark 16:1: “Mary Magdalene, and Mary the mother of James, and Salome, had bought sweet spices.” Their purpose was to anoint the body of Jesus. They were not able to buy their spices untilafter the Sabbath was passed. Yet Luke 23:56 explains that they prepared these spices “and rested the Sabbath day according to the commandment.” While this may appear confusing, it need not be if these two passages are studied carefully.
Only one possible explanation emerges. It is that these women bought and prepared their spices on Friday, after the Thursday annual high day Sabbath—or the first feast day of Unleavened Bread—and then rested on the weekly Sabbath, which was Saturday according to God’s plain command found inExodus 20:8-11.
Mark 16:1 and Luke 23:56 must refer to two separate Sabbaths of that crucifixion week—with a day in between, Friday. Any other explanation creates a contradiction of scripture and the Bible nevercontradicts itself.
Sunday is Not “The Lord’s Day”
There is another very important reason why theologians and many others must conclude that the resurrection was on Sunday! Sunday is commonly referred to as “the Lord’s Day.” While the true Lord’s Day of the Bible is actually the Day of the Lord—the DAY OF HIS WRATH (Joel 2:1-11; Rev. 1:10; 15:1, 7)—the term “the Lord’s Day” has come to be synonymous with Sunday. But why? The reason is simple. If Sunday can be established as the day that Christ was resurrected, it can be a means of validating and “authorizing” the keeping of Sunday by the churches of the world, in place of God’s true Sabbath.
You have already seen references to the Sabbath day in this booklet. Exodus 20:8-11 shows that the keeping of the Sabbath is the Fourth Commandment! It was always the seventh day of the week and God never authorized Sunday—which would be keeping the first day instead. God hallowed it at creation—long before there were any Jews or Israelites to keep it (Gen. 2:1). The Sabbath was to be kept “forever”—“continually”—and “throughout the generations” of Israel, God’s intended model nation (Ex. 31:12-17). Christ kept it (Luke 4:16) and said that He was Lord of it and that it was “made forman” (Mark 2:27-28). He did not say it was “made for the Jews only.” Paul observed it (Acts 13:42, 44;17:2; 18:4).
The subject of keeping the Sabbath as God’s command for true Christians is a big subject requiring its own book to explain it. Therefore, more than the Good Friday-Easter Sunday tradition collapses if Christ was in the grave for 72 hours instead of 36. The largest single reason for the unscriptural tradition (recall Mark 7:7) of Sunday-keeping collapses at the same time. God has always said, “Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy” (Ex. 20:8). He has never said, “Remember Sunday to keep it holy—and just call it the Lord’s day!” The reader is left to ponder this. What is the Source of Your Beliefs?
Herbert W. Armstrong concluded his booklet “The Resurrection Was Not On Sunday” with:
“For proof of the pagan origin of such long-cherished days as Easter and Christmas... The shocking truth is that nowhere can you find sanctions for those two holidays in the Bible. It is time we discovered the source of our religious beliefs and found out whether we ought to observe them.”


Monday, November 24, 2014

LORD'S PASSION 3 - Passion Sunday (Cycle A)

Homily for the Passion Sunday (Cycle A)
Based on Mt 26:14 – 27:66(Gospel),Is 50:4-7(First Reading) and Phil 2:6-11(Second Reading)
From the Series: “Reflections and Teachings of the Desert”


LORD’S PASSION 3
The Gospel reading for this Passion Sunday (Cycle A) is taken from Mt 26:14 – 27:66.  The first title under “Judas betrays Jesus” has parallel texts that are:
1.       Mk 14:10-11 - Judas Iscariot, one of the Twelve, approached the chief priests with an offer to hand Jesus over to them (v. 10). They were delighted to hear it, and promised to give him money; and he looked for a way of betraying him when the opportunity should occur (v. 11).
2.       Lk 23:3-6 - The day of the Unleavened Bread came round, the day on which the Passover had to be sacrificed, and he sent Peter and John saying, ‘Go and make the preparations for us to eat the Passover’. They asked, ‘Where do you want us to prepare it?’ He said, ‘Listen, as you go into the city you will meet a man carrying a pitcher of water. Follow him into the house he enters And tell the owner of the house, “The Master has this to say to you: ‘Where is the dining room in which I can eat the Passover with my disciples?’ The man will show you a large upper room furnished with couches. Make the preparations there”. They set off and found everything as he had told them, and prepared the Passover

Chapter 26, verses 14, 15 and 16 say: Then one of the Twelve, the man called Judas Iscariot, went to the chief priests and said, “What are you prepared to give me if I hand him over to you?” They paid him thirty  silverpieces,c and from that moment he looked for an opportunity to betray him.Footnotec  says “Thirty shekels – and not thirty denarii as is commonly said. It was the price the Law fixed for a slave’s life, Ex. 21:32.

Parallel texts for verse 15 are:
1.       Mt 27:3f -When he found that Jesus had been condemned, Judas his betrayer was filled with remorse and took the thirty silver pieces back to the chief priests and elders.
2.       Gn 37:28 - Now some Midianite merchants were passing, and they drew Joseph up out of the well. They sold Joseph to the Ishmaelite for twenty silver pieces, and these men took Joseph to Egypt.
3.       Zc 1:12 - When that time comes I will search Jerusalem by torchlight, and punish the men who are stagnating on their lees, those who say in their hearts, ‘Yahweh has not power for good or for evil’.

The second title “Preparations for the Passover” has the following parallel texts:
1.       Mk 14:12-16 - Preparations for the Passover supper. On the first day of Unleavened Bread, when the Passover lamb was sacrificed, his disciples said to him, "Where do you want us to go and make the preparations for you to eat the passover?" (v. 12).So he sent two of his disciples, saying to them, "Go into the city and you will meet a man carrying a pitcher of water. Follow him (v. 13), And say to the owner of the house which he enters, 'The Master says: Where is my dining room, in which I can eat the passover with my disciples?'  (v. 14).He will show you a large upper room, furnished with couches, all prepared. Make preparations for us there (v. 15)." The disciples set out and went to the city and found everything just as he had told them, and prepared the Passover (v. 16).

2.       Lk 22:7-13 - The day of the Unleavened Bread came round, the day on which the Passover had to be sacrificed, and he sent Peter and John saying, ‘Go and make the preparations for us to eat the passover’. They asked, ‘Where do you want us to prepare it?’ He said, ‘Listen, as you go into the city you will meet a man carrying a pitcher of water. Follow him into the house he enters And tell the owner of the house, “The Master has this to say to you: ‘Where is the dining room in which I can eat the Passover with my disciples?’ The man will show you a large upper room furnished with couches. Make the preparations there”. They set off and found everything as he had told them, and prepared the Passover.

Verses 17, 18 and 19 say: Now on the first day of the Unleavened Breadd the disciples came to Jesus to say, ‘Where do you want us to make the preparations for you to eat the passover?’  He replied,  ‘Go to so and so in the city and say to him, “The Master says: My time is near. It is at your house that I am  keeping Passover with my disciples”’ The disciples did what Jesus told them and prepared the Passover. Footnote d says “The ‘first day’ of the week during which unleavened loaves (azymes) were eaten, cf. Ex. 12:1+; 23:14+, was normally that which followed the Passover supper, i.e. the 15th of Nissan; the Synoptics however give this title to the preceding day, thus attesting the wider use of the term. Further, if we take account of Jn 18:28 and of other details connected with the Passion, it is fairly certain that in this particular year the Passover supper was celebrated on the evening of Friday (or ‘Preparation Day’, Mt 27:62; f. Jn 19:14,31,42). Christ’s Last Supper, which the Synoptics put on the day before, i.e. on the Thursday evening, must therefore be explained in one of two ways: either a whole section of the Jewish people thus anticipated the rite, or (and this is referable) Christ anticipated it on his own initiative. In this second hypothesis Jesus, unable to celebrate the Passover on the Friday (though, indeed, he celebrated it in his own person on the cross, Jn 19:36+; 1 Co 5:7), instituted his new rite in the course of a supper which, in consequence, became endowed with the characteristics of the old Passover. Nisan 14th (the day of the Passover supper) fell on a Friday in 30 and 33 AD; interpreters therefore take one or other of these years as the date of Christ’s death according as they assign his baptism in 28 or to 29 and reckon a longer or shorter public ministry. Note: the Dead Sea scrolls have recently revealed a community which, following a solar calendar, always celebrated the Passover supper on a Tuesday evening> it is possible that Jesus did the same. If so, the Synoptics have fitted into a few hours juridical processes which in fact took days.”

Parallel texts for verse 17 are:
1.       Jn 13:1 - It was before the festival of the Passover, and Jesus knew that the hour had come for him to pass from this world to the Father.a He had always lovedb  those who were his in the world, but now he showed how perfect his love was.cFootnotea  says“According to a Jewish tradition the  word “Passover’ (pesah): cf. Ex. 12:11+) mean a passing, or crossing over’, referring it to the crossing of the Red Sea, Ex 14, Christ (and we with him) will pass from the world, which is enslaved by sin, to the Father’s company, the true Land of Promise. Cf. Jh 1:21+.”; Footnote b  says “Here, for the first time, Jn clearly states that Christ’s life and death are an expression of his love for his disciples. The impression given is one of a secret kept for these last moments, 13:34; 15:9,13; 17:23; 1 Jn 3:16; Ga 2:20; Rm 8:35; Ep 3:19; 5:2,25.”; Footnote c says “Lit. ‘ he loved  them to the end’, i.e. utterly”.
2.       Jn 18:28 - They then led Jesus from the house of Caiphas to the Praetorium.d It was now morning. They did not go into the Praetorium themselves or they would be defilede and unable to eat the passover.Footnoted  says“The Roman procurator’s judicial court.”; Footnote e says“To enter a pagan house was to incur legal impurity, cf. Ac 11:2f.”
3.       Jn19:14 - It was Passover Preparation Daye about the sixth hourf.Footnoteesays “In the course of this day, the Passover supper was made ready (it was eaten after sunset, cf.  Ex 12:6+) and everything necessary prepared so that the feast could be celebrated without violating the rest prescribed by the Law.”; Footnote f says“About noon, the time by which all leaven had to be removed from the house; during the Passover unleavened bread (‘azymes’) was to be eaten, cf. Ex 12:15f. It is possible that the evangelist wishes to call attention to this coincidence; cf. 1 Co 5:7.”
4.       Jn 2:4 -Jesus said, ‘Woman,c why turn to me?d My houre has not come yet.Footnotec says“Unusual address from son to mother; the term is used again in 19:26 where there may be a reference to Gn. 3:15,20: Mary is the second Eve , ‘the mother of the  living’.”; Footnote d says“Lit. ‘What to me and to thee’, a semitic formula not frequent in OT, Jg 11:12; 2 S 16:10; 19:23; 1 K 17:18; etc. and in NT, Mt. 8:29; Mk 1:24; 5:7; Lk 4:34; 8:28. It is used to deprecate interference or, more strongly, to reject overtures of any kind. The shade of meaning could be deduced only from the context. Here Jesus objects that his hour has not yet come.”; Footnote e  says “The ‘hour’ of his glorification and of his return to the Father’s right hand. Its approach is noted by the evangelist, 7:30; 8:20; 12:23,27; 13:1; 17:1.This ‘hour’  is determined by the Father and cannot be anticipated, though the miracle worked through Mary’s intervention is a prophetic symbol of it.”

The third title is The Treachery of Judas” foretold” that has the following parallels:
1.       Mk 14:17-21 - When Evening came, he arrived with the Twelve (v.17) and while they were at table eating, Jesus said, “I tell you solemnly, one of you is about to betray me, one of you who is eating with me now (v. 18).”They were distressed and asked him, one after another, “Not I, surely?” (v. 19). He said to them, “It is one of the Twelve, one who is dipping into the same dish with me (v.20). Yes, the Son of Man indeed is going to his fate as the scripture say he will, but alas for that man by whom the Son of Man is betrayed. Better for that man if he had never been born” (v. 21).
2.       Lk 22:14, 21-23 - When the hour came he took his place at table, and the apostles with him (v. 14). And yet, here with me on the table is the hand of the man who betrays me (v. 21). The Son of Man does indeed go to his fate as it has been decreed, but alas for that man by whom he is betrayed!” (v. 22) And they began to ask one another which of them it could be who was to do this thing (v. 23).
3.       Jn 13:21-30 - Having said this, Jesus was troubled and declared, “I tell you most solemnly, one of you will betray me (v. 21).”The disciples looked at one another, wondering which he meant (v. 22).The disciples Jesus loved was reclining next to Jesus(v.23). Simon Peter signed and said, ‘Ask who it is he meant (v.24), so leaning back on Jesus’ breast he said, “Who is it, Lord?” (v. 25). “It is the one’ replied Jesus ‘to whom I give a piece of breadn that I shall dip in the dish.” He dipped the piece of bread and gave it to Judas son of Simon the Iscariot (v.26).At that instant, after Judas had taken the bread, Satan entered him. Jesus then said, “What you are going to do, do quickly (v. 27). None of the others at table understood the reason he said this (v.28). Since Judas had charge of the common fund, some of them thought  Jesus was telling him, “Buy what we need for the festival,” or telling him to give something to the poor (v.29)As soon as he had taken the piece of bread he  went out. Night had fallen  (v. 30).Footnote n says“Lit. ‘morsel’. This particular ‘morsel’ is not the Holy Eucharist; nevertheless, a comparison of 13:2,18 with 6:64,70 seems to show that there was some connection between the institution and Judas’ act of treachery. Cf. Lk 22:21.”

Verses 20, 21, 12 and 23 say: When evening came he was at table with the twelve disciples. And while they were eating,e he said, “I tell you solemnly, one of you is about to betray me They were greatly distressed and started asking him in turn, “Not I, Lord,  surely?” Footnotee  says “The fifth course: it preceded the Passover supper properly so called.”

Parallel text is Ps 55: 13-14 that says: But you, a man of your own rank, a colleague and a friend, to whom sweet conversion bound me in the house of God.

Verse23 says: He answered, “Someone who has dipped his hand into the dish with me, will betray me.

Parallel texts are:
1.       Ps 41:9 - Even my closest and trusted friend, who shared my table, rebelsf against me. Footnotef says “Lit. ‘lifts the heel against me’. Jesus applied this text to Judas”.
2.       Jn 13:18 - I am not speaking about all of you: I know the ones I have chosen; but what scripture says must be fulfilled: Someone who shares my tablel rebels against me.Footnote l says“Lit. ‘has lifted his heel against me’.”

Verses 24 and 25 say: The Son of Man is going to his fate, as scripture say he will, but alas to the man by whom the Son of Man is betrayed! Better for that man if he had never been born”. Judas, who was to betray him, asked in his turn, ‘Not I, Rabbi,  surely?’ ‘They are your own words,’ answered Jesus.

Footnote

Parallel texts of verse 24 say:
1.       Jb 3:3 - May the day perish when I was born, and the night that told of a boy conceived.a Footnote a says “Two parallel curses: one of the day of birth, the other of the night of conception.”

2.       Jn 17:12 - While I was with them, I kept those you had given me true to your name. I have watched over them and not one is lost except the one who chose to be lost,k and this was to fulfill the scriptures. Footnote k says “Lit. ‘the son of perdition’.”

The fourth title “The institution of the Eucharist” has the following parallel texts:
1.       Mk 14:22-25 - And as they were eating he took some bread, and when he has said the blessing he broke it and gave it to them. He said, ‘Take it, this is my body (v. 22).’Then he took a cup, and when he had returned thanks he gave it to them, and all drank from it (v. 23). And he said to them, ‘This is my blood of the covenant, which is to be poured out for many (v. 24).
2.       Lk 22:19-20 - The institution of the Eucharistg. Then he took some bread and when he had given thanks, broke it and gave it to them saying, ‘This is my body which will be given for you; do this as a memorial of me (v. 19)’. He did the same with the cup after supper, and said, ‘This cup is the new covenant in my blood which will be poured out for you (v. 20)’ h Footnote g  says “Note the affinity between Luke’s text and Paul’s.”; and Footnote  h  says “Or alternatively ‘which has to be given’ and ‘which has to be poured out’”.
3.       1 Co 11:23-25 - For this is what I received from the Lord, and in turn passed on to you: that on the same night that he was betrayed, the Lord Jesus took some bread (v. 23) and thanked God for it and broke it, and he said, ‘This is my body, which is for you;i do this as a memorial of me (v.24).  In the same way he took the cup after supper, and said, “This is the cup of the new covenant in my blood. Whenever you drink it,  do this asa memorial of me (v.25).”FootnoteI says “Var. ‘This is my body, broken for you.’”

4.       Jn 6:51-58 - I am the living bread which has come down from heaven. Anyone one who eats this bread will live forever; and the bread that I shall give is my flesh,nfor the life of the world.’o Then the Jews started arguing with one another: ‘How can this man give us his flesh to eat?’ they said (v. 52). Jesus replied: ‘I tell you most solemnly, if you do not eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you will not have life in you (v. 53). Anyone who does  eat my flesh and drink my blood has eternal life, and I shall raise him up on the last day (v. 54). For my flesh is real food and my blood is real drink (v. 55). He who eats my flesh and drinks my blood lives in me and I live in him (v. 56). As I, who am sent by the living Father, myself draw life from the Father, so whoever eats me will draw life from me.p (v. 57). This is the bread come down from heaven; not like the bread our ancestors ate;q they are dead, but anyone who eats this bread will live forever (v. 58). Footnote n  says “Add ‘that I shall give’; the phrase is, in any case, to be understood.”; Footnote o  says “Jesus is the true bread because he is God’s Word, vv. 32f, and also because he is a victim whose body and blood are offered in sacrifice for the life of the world, vv. 51-58, cf. 6:22+. The word ‘flesh’ suggests a connection between the Eucharist and incarnation: the Word made flesh, 1:14, is the food of man.”; Footnote p  says “The life that the Father communicates to the Son passes to the faithful through the Eucharist.”; and  Footnote q says  “Add. ‘the manna’ or ‘in the desert’.”

Verses 26 and 27 say: Now as they were eating,f Jesus took some bread, and when he had said the blessing he broke it and gave it to the disciples. He said, ‘Take it and eat; this is my body’. Then he took a cup, and when he had returned thanks he gave it to them. He said, ‘Drink all of you from this. Footnote f says “They have come to the Passover supper itself. The rubrics for this solemn blessing of bread and wine are laid down exactly; on to this ceremony Jesus grafts the sacramental rites of the new religious order of things which he institutes.”

Parallel text for verse 27 is1 Co 10:16 that says: The blessing-cuph that we bless is a communion with the blood of Christ and the bread that we break is a communion in the body of Christ. Footnote h says “I.e. the cup of wine for which we thank God, like Christ at the Last Supper.”

Verse 28 says: For this is my blood, the blood of theg covenant, which is to be poured out for many for the forgiveness of sinsh. Footnote g  says “Add (Vulg.) ‘new’, cf. Lk 22:20; 1 Co 11:25.”; and Footnote h  says “As at Sinai, the blood of victims sealed the covenant of Yahweh with his people, Ex. 24:4-8+, so on the cross the blood of Jesus, the perfect victim, is about to seal the ‘new’ covenant, cf. Lk. 22:20, between God  and man - the covenant foretold by the prophets, Jr 31:31+. Jesus takes on himself the task of universal redemption that Isaiah assigns to the ‘servant of Yahweh’, Is. 42:6; 49:6; 53:12, cf. 41:8+. Cf. Heb 8:8; 9:15; 12:24.”

Parallel texts are:
1.       Ex 24:8 - Then Moses took the bloodc and cast it towards the people. ‘This’ he said ‘is the blood of the Covenant that Yahweh has made you, containing all these rules.’Footnotec says “Moses is the mediator between God and the people; he unites them symbolically by sprinkling the blood of a single victim first on the altar, which represents Yahweh, and then on the people. In this way the pact is ratified by blood, cf. Lv 1:5+, just as the New Covenant is ratified by the blood of Christ.
2.       Zc 9:11 - As for you. Because of the blood of the covenantn I am sending your prisoners from the pit (in which there is no water).Footnote n  says“ Allusion either to the ceremony at Sinai, Ex. 24:5f, or to the sacrifice offered in the temple.”
3.       Mt 20:28…just as the Son of Man came not to be served but to serve, and to give his life as a ransomg for many.hFootnote g says “By sin man incurs, as a debt to the divine justice, the punishment of death demanded by the Law, cf. 1 Co. 15:56; 2 Co. 3:7,9; Ga. 3:13; Rm. 8:3-4, with notes. To ransom them from this slavery of sin and death, Rm. 3:24+. Christ is to pay the ransom and discharge the debt with the price of his blood, 1 Co. 6:20; 7:23; Ga. 3:13; 4:5, with notes, By thus dying in place of the guilty, he fulfills the prophesied function of the ‘servant of Yahweh’ (Is. 53). The Hebr. word translated ‘many’, Is. 53:11f, contrast the enormous crowd of the redeemed with the one Redeemer: it does not imply that the number of redeemed is limited, Rm. 5:6-21. Cf. Mt. 26:28+.”; and Footnote h says“At this point some authorities insert the following passage, derived probably from some apocryphal gospel ‘But as for you, from littleness you seek to grow great and from greatness you make yourselves small. When you are invited to a banquet do not take one of the places of honor, because someone more important than you may arrive and then the steward will have to say, “Move down lower”, and you would be covered with confusion. Take the lowest place, and then if someone less important than you comes in, the steward will say to you, “Move up higher”, and that will be to your advantage.’ Cf. Lk. 14:8-10.”
4.       Is 53:12 - Hence I will grant whole hordes for his tribute, he shall divide the spoil with the mighty, for surrendering himself to death and letting himself be taken for a sinner while he was bearing the faults of many, and praying all the time for sinners.

Verse 29 says: From now on, I tell you, I shall not drink wine until the day I drink the new wine with you in the kingdom of my Fatheri.  Footnote i says “Allusion to the eschatological banquet, cf. 8:11; 22:1f. Jesus and his disciples will never meet at table again.”

Parallel text is  Mt 8:11 that says: And I tell you that many will come from east and west to take their places with Abraham and Isaac and Jacob at the feastc in the kingdom of heaven…Footnotec says “Basing their idea on Is 25:6, the Jews often described the joyous messianic era as a banquet (cf. 22:2-14; 26:29p; Lk 14:15; Rv 3:20; 19:9).”

The fifth title is “Peter’s denial foretold”.

Verse 30 says: After psalms had been sungj they left out for the Mount of Olives. Footnote j  says “The psalms of the Hallel, Ps 113-118, with which the Passover meal closed.”

Parallel texts are:
1.       Mk 14:26-31 - After psalms had been sung they left out for the Mount of Olives (v. 26). And Jesus said to them, ‘You will all lose faith, for the scripture says: I shall strike the shepherd and the sheep will be scattered (v. 27), however after my resurrection I shall go before you to Galilee (v. 28)’. Peter said, ‘Even is all lose faith, I will not’ (v. 29). And Jesus said to him, ‘I tell you solemnly, this day, this very might, before the cock crows twice, you will have disowned me three times’ (v. 30). But he repeated still more earnestly, ‘If I have to die with you, I will never disown you’. And they all said the same (v. 31).
2.       Lk 22:31-34 -“Simon, Simon! Satan, you must know, has got his wish to sift you all like wheat (v. 31);but I have prayed for you, Simon, that your faith may not fail, and once you have recovered, you in turn must strengthen your brothers (v. 32)’. ‘Lord,’ he answered, ‘I would be ready to go to prison with you and to death (v. 33)’. Jesus replied, “I tell you, Peter, by the time the cock crows today you will have denied three times that you know me (v. 34).
3.       Jn 13:36-38 - Simon Peter said, ‘Lord, where are you going?’ Jesus replied, ‘Where I am going you cannot follow me now; you will follow me later’u (v. 36). Peter said to him,v “Why can’t I follow you now? I will lay down my life for you (v. 37).”“Lay down your life for me?’’Jesus answered ‘I tell you solemnly, before the cock crow you will have disowned me three times (v. 38).’ Footnote u says “A cryptic prophecy of Peter’s martyrdom.”; and Footnote v says “Add ‘Lord’.”
4.       Jn 16:32 - Listen; the time will come-in fact it has come already-when you will be scattered, each going his own way and leaving me alone. And yet I am not alone, because the Father is with me.

Verse 31 says: Then Jesus said to them, “You will all lose faith in me this night,k for it is written: ‘I will strike the shepherd, and the sheep of the flock will be dispersed’; Footnotek says “Lit. ‘brought down’; it will be an obstacle for their faith when they see the one they believe to be Messiah, 16:16, and whose approaching triumph they expect, 20:21f, passively yield to his enemies. For a time it will make them lose courage and even faith, cf. Lk 22:31-32.”

Parallel text is Zc 13:7 that says:Awake, sword, against my shepherd and against the man who is my companion- it is Yahweh Sabaoth who speaks. I am going to strikee the shepherd so that the sheep may be scattered, and I will turn my hand against the weak. Footnotee that “‘I am going to strike’ conj., cf. some Greek MSS and Mt 26:31; ‘Strike’ Hebr.”

Verses 32, 33 and 34 says: but after my resurrection, I shall go before you to Galilee”.  At this Peter said, “Though all lose faith in you I will never lose faith.” Jesus answered him, “I tell you solemnly, this very night before the cock crows, you will have disowned me three times.”

Parallel text for verse 32 is Mt 28:7 that says:...then go quickly and tell his disciples, ‘He has risen from the dead, and now he is going before you to Galilee; it is there you will see him.’ Now I have told you.”

Verse 35 says: Peter said to him, “Even if I have to die with you, I will never disown you.” And all the disciples said the same.

Parallel text is Mt 26:69-75 that says: Meanwhile Peter was sitting outside in the courtyard, and a servant girl came up to him and said, “You too were with Jesus the Galilean (v.69).”But he denied it in front of them all. “I do not know what you are talking about’, he said (v. 70). When he went out to the gateway another servant girl saw him and said to the people there, “This man was with Jesus the Nazarenew’(v.71) And again, with an oath, he denied it. ‘I do not know the man(v. 72)’. A little later the bystanders came up and said to Peter, “You are one of them for sure! Why, your accentx gives you away (v.73).’ Then he started calling down curse son himself and swearing, “I do not know the man.” At that moment the cock crew, (v.74) and Peter remembered what Jesus had said, “Before the cock crows you will have disowned me three times’. And he went outside and wept bitterly (v.75). Footnote w says “Nazoraios, var. (cf. Vulg.) Nazarenos.”; and Footnote x  says“The Galilean accent.”

The sixth title is “Gethsemane”. For this title, the parallel texts are:
1.       Mk 14:32-42 - They came to a small estate called Gethsemane, and Jesus said to his disciples, ‘Stay here while I pray’(v. 32) Then he took Peter and James and John  with him. And sudden fear came over him,  and great distress (v.33) And he said to them, “My soul is sorrowful even to the point of death. Wait here, and keep awake (v.34)  And going on a little further he threw himself to the ground and prayed that, if it were possible, this hour might pass by him(v. 35); “Abba, (Father)!’ he said  ‘Everything is possible for you. Take this cup away from me.But let it be as you, not I, would have it (v.36)” He came back and found them sleeping, and he said to Peter, “Simon, are you asleep? Had you not the strength to keep awake one hour (v. 37). You should be awake, and praying not to be put to the test. The spirit is willing but the flesh is weak (v. 38).” Again, he went away and prayed, saying the same words. (v. 39). And once more he came back and found them sleeping, their eyes were so heavy; and they could find noanswer for him (v.40) He came back a third time and said to them, “You can  sleep on now and take your rest. It is all over. The hour has come. Now the Son of Man is to be betrayed into the hands of sinners (v.41). Get up!Let us go!My betrayer is close at hand already (v. 42).”
2.       Lk 22:40-46 - When they reached the place he said to them, ‘Pray not to be put to the test (v. 40).’Then he withdrew from them, about a stone’s throw away, and knelt down and prayed (v. 41).“Father,’he said ‘if you are willing, take this cup away from me. Nevertheless, let your will be done, not mine (v. 42). Then an angel appeared to him,  coming from heaven to give him strength (v. 43). In his anguish he prayed even more earnestly, and his sweat fell to the ground like drops of blood (v. 44)lWhen he rose from prayer he went to the disciples and found them sleeping for sheer grief (v. 45). ‘Why are you asleep?’ he said to them. ‘Get up and pray not to be put the test (v. 46).’Footnotel   says “Om.Vv. 43-44.”
3.       Jn 18:1 - After he had said all this Jesus left with his disciples and crossed the Kedron valley. There was a garden there, and he went into it with his disciples (v. 1).
4.       Jn12:27-30 - Now my soul is troubled.fWhat shall I say: Father, save me from this hour? But it was for this very reason that I have come to this hour (v.27) Father, glorify your name!’g A voice came from heaven, ‘I have glorified it, and I will glorify it again’ (v. 28).People standing by, who heard this, said it was a clap of thunder; others said, ‘It was an angel speaking to him’ (v. 29). Jesus answered, “It was not for my sake that this voice came, but for yours (v. 30).hFootnotef says “This episode and Gethsemane have many details in common; the anguish of the ‘hour’ draws near, the appeal to the Father’s pity, the acceptance of death, the comfort from heaven (cf. Lk.). But we should note the dissimilarities: in Jn, Christ’s prayer for pity remains unuttered; nor does he ‘fall to the ground’ (Mt. Mk.) or ‘kneel’ (Lk).  Cf. Jn 18:4-6; 10:18+.”;Footnoteg  says“Var. ‘your Son’. The Father’s name is his person. Jesus worked for the Father’s glory; his death, now freely offered, is the completion of that work because it shows how great is the Father’s love for men, 17:6+.”; and Footnoteh says“Christ’s coming death is divinely and publicly sanctioned.”
5.       Heb 5:7-10 - During his life on earth,a he offered up prayers and entreaty, aloud and in silent tears, to one who had the power to save him out of death,b and he submitted so humbly that c that his prayer was heard (v. 7). Although, he was Son, he learnt to obey through suffering (v. 8). But having been made perfect,d he became for all who obey him the source of eternal salvation (v. 9). and was acclaimed by God with the title of high priest of the order of  Melchizedek (v. 10).Footnotea  says“Lit. ‘in the days of his flesh’ (on the word ‘flesh’ cf. Rm. 7:5+). The emphasis of this section is on humanity; a priest must be human  since he represents human beings and he must share their sufferings since he must feel compassion for them, CF. 2:17-18 ; 4:15 Jesus  suffered in this way all through his life on earth, and especially in his agony and death.”; Footnote b  says“Not saved from dying. Since that was the purpose of his life, Jn 12:27f, but rescued from death after dying, Ac 2:24f. God transformed his death by raising him to glory after it, Jn 12:27f; 13:31f; 17:5; Ph 2:9-11; Heb. 2:9.”; Footnote c says“Lit. ‘because of his eulabela’ (i.e, religious awe). It was because the prayers of Christ in Gethsemane was a prayer of total submission to the will of his Father, Mt. 26:39,42, that it was heard and answered.”; and Footnote d says “Having totally succeeded in his task of being priest and victim.”

Verses 36, 37, 38, and 39  say: Then Jesus came with them to a small estate called Gethsemane;l and he said to his disciples, ‘Stay here while I go over there to pray’. He took Peter and the two sons of Zebedee with him. And sadness came over him,  and great distress. Then he said to them, “My soul is sorrowful to the point of death.m Wait here and keep awake with me’. And going on a little further he fell on his face and prayed. ‘My Father,’ he said ‘if it is possible, let this cup pass me by. Nevertheless, let it be as you, not I, would have it’n.Footnote l says “The name means ‘oilpress’. It lies in the Kedron valley at the foot of the Mt. of Olives”; Footnote m says “The turn of phrase recalls Ps. 42:5 and Jon 4:9”; and Footnoten  says “Jesus feels the full ‘force of the human fear of death; he feels the instinctive urge to escape, gives expression to it and then stifles it by his acceptance of the Father’s will.”
Parallel texts for verse 39 are:
1.       2 Co 12:8 - About this thing, I have pleaded with the Lord three times for it to leave me…
2.       Mt 6:10 - your kingdom come, your will be done, on earth as in heaven.

Verse 40 says: He came back to the disciples and found them sleeping, and he said to Peter, “So you had not the strength to keep awake with me one hour?

Parallel texts are:
1.       Jn 4:34 - But Jesus said: ‘My food is to do the will of the one who sent me, and to complete his work.
2.       Jn 6:38…because I have come from heaven, not to do my own will, but to do the will of the one who sent me.
3.       Rm 5:19 - As by one man’s disobedience many were made sinners, so by one man’s obedience many will be made righteous.m Footnote m says “Not only at the Last Judgment (for Paul regards justification as a present condition, cf. 5:1, etc.)’ but progressively as each individual becomes reborn in Christ.”
4.       Ph 2:8 - he was humbler yet, even to accepting death, death on a cross…

Verse 41 says: You should be awake and praying not to be put to the test. The spirit is willing, but the flesh is weak.’

Parallel text is Ps 69:20b that says:…are past cure;g I had hoped for sympathy, but in vain, I found no one to console me. Footnoteg says “‘ are past cure’ corr.; ‘I tremble’ Hebr.”

Verse 42 says: Again, a second time, he went away and prayed: ‘My Father,’ he said ‘if this cup cannot pass by without my drinking it, your will be done!’

Parallel texts are:
1.       Rm 7:5 - Before our conversions our sinful passions, quite unsubdued by the Law, fertilized our bodied to make them give birth to death.
2.       2 Co 12:8 - About this thing, I have pleaded with the Lord three times for it to leave me…
Verse 43 says: And he came back again and found them sleeping, their eyes were so heavy.

Parallel text is Heb 10:9 that says:…and then he says: Here I am! I am coming to obey your will. He is abolishing the first sort to replace it with the second.

Verses 44 and 45 says: Leaving them there, he went away again and prayed for the third time, repeating the same words. Then he came back to the disciples and said to them, “You can sleep on now and take your rest.o Behold, the hour is at hand when the Son of Man is to be handed over to sinners. Footnoteo  says  “Gently ironical reproach. The hour you should have stayed awake with have slipped by. Now the testing time had begun and Jesus must go through it alone; the disciples may go on sleeping if they wish.”
Parallel text for verse 45 is 2 Co 12:8 that says:About this thing, I have pleaded with the Lord three times for it to leave me…

Verse 46 says: Get up! Let us go. My betrayer is already close at hand.

Parallel text is Jn 14:30-31 that says:I shall not talk with you any longer,u because the prince of this world is on his way. He has no power over me (v. 30), but the world must be brought to know that I love the Father and that I am doing exactly what the Father told me. Come now, let us go (v. 31).

The seventh title is “The arrest” with the following parallel texts:
1.       Mk 14:43-52 - Even while he was still speaking, Judas, one of the Twelve, came up with a number of men armed with swords and clubs, sent by the chief priests and the scribes and the elders (v.43). Now the traitor had arranged a signal with them,  “The one I kiss’ he had said ‘he is the man; take him in charge, and see he is guarded when you lead him away” (v. 44). So when the traitor came, he went straight up to Judas and said, ‘Rabbi!’ and kissed him (v.45). The others seized him and took him in charge (v.46). Then one of the bystanders drew his sword and struck out at the high priest’s servant, and cut off his ear (v.47). Then Jesus spoke, “Am I a brigand’ he said ‘that you had set out to capture me with swords and clubs? (v. 48). I was among you teaching in the Temple day after day and you never laid hands on me. But this to fulfill the scriptures’ (v.49). And they all deserted him and ran away (v.50).
2.       Lk 22:47-53 - He was still speaking when a number of men appeared, and at the head of them the man called Judas, one of the Twelve, who went up to Jesus to kiss him (v. 47).Jesus said, “Judas, are you betraying the Son of Man with a kiss?” (v. 48). His followers, seeing what was happening, said, “Lord, shall we use our sword?” (v. 49). And one of them struck out at the high priest’s servant and cut off his right ear (v. 50). But at this Jesus spoke. “Leave off!’ he said that will do!” And touching the man’s ear he healed him (v. 51). Then Jesus spoke to the chief priests and captains of the Temple guards and elders who had come for him, ‘Am I a brigand‘ he said ‘that you had set out with swords and clubs? (v. 52). When I was among you in the Temple  day after day, you never moved to lay hands on me. But this is your hour; this is the reign of darkness (v. 53).
3.       Jn 18:2-11 - Judas the traitor knew the place well,since Jesus had often met his disciples there (v. 2). And he brought a cohorta to this place together with adetachment of guards sent by the chief priests and the Pharisees, all with lanterns, torches and weapons (v. 3). Knowing everything that was going to happen to him, Jesusthen came forward and said, “Who are you looking for?” (v. 4)They answered him, “Jesus the Nazarene.” He said, “I am he.” Now Judas the traitor was standing among them v. 5). When Jesus said, “I amhe,” they moved back and fell to the ground (v. 6). He asked them a second time, “Who are you looking for?” They said, “Jesus the Nazarene (v. 7).’ “I told you that I am he’repliedJesus,‘If I am the one you are looking, let these others go.” (v. 8). This was to fulfill the words he had spoken, “Not one of those you gave me have I lost.” (v. 10). Simon Peter, who carried a sword, drew it and wounded the high priest’s servant, cutting off his right ear. The servant’s name was Malchus (v. 11). Jesus said to Peter, “Put your sword back in the scabbard;  am I not drink the cup that the Father gave me? (v. 11). Footnotea  says “A detachment from the Roman garrison in Jerusalem.”

Verses 47 to 52 say: He was still speaking when Judas, one of the Twelve, appeared, and with him a large number of men armed with swords and clubs, sent by the chief priests and the elders of the people.Now the traitor had arranged a sign with them. “The one I kiss’ he had said ‘he is the man.Take him in charge.”So he went straight up to Jesus and said, ‘Greetings, Rabbi’, and he kissed him.Jesus said to him, “My friend, do what you are herefor.”p Then they came forward, seized Jesus and took him in charge.At that, one of the followers of Jesus grasp his sword and drew it; he struck out at the high priest’s servant, and cut off his ear.Jesusthen  said to him, “Put your sword back,  for all who draw the sword will die by the sword (v.  52).Footnotep says“Lit. ‘Friend, for what you are here’. To a question (‘Why are you here!’) one may prefer or a reproach (‘For what purpose are you here!) one may prefer to see in this a stereotype phrase meaning ‘do what you are here for’, ‘to your work!’ Jesus cuts short the empty show of greeting it is time for action. Cf. Jn 13:22.”

Parallel texts for verse 49 are:
1.       Pr 27:6 - From one who loves, wounds are well-intentioned; from one who hates, kisses are ominous.
2.       Mt 26:23 - He answered, “Someone who has dipped his hand into the dish with me, will betray me.
Verse 53 says: Or do you think that I cannot appeal to my Father who would promptly send more than twelve legions of angels to my defense? (v. 53).

Parallel text is Jn 18:36 that say:‘Mine is not a kingdom of this world; if my kingdom were of this world, my men would have fought to prevent my being surrendered to the Jews. But my kingdom is not of this kind.

Verse 54 says: But then, how would the scriptures be fulfilled that say this is the way it must be?” (v. 54).

Parallel text is Lk 24:26-27 that say: Was it not ordained that the Christ should suffer and so enter into his glory? (v. 26)’ Then, starting with Moses and going through all the prophets, he explained to them the passages throughout the scriptures that were about himself (v. 27).

Verses 55 and 56 say: I was at this time that Jesus said to the crowds, “Am I a brigands that you had to set out  to capture me with swords and clubs? I sat teaching in the temple  day after day and you never laid hands on me (v.55). Now all this had happened  to fulfill the prophecies of the scriptures.” Then all the disciples deserted him and ran away.

Parallel text is Jn 18:20 that say: Jesus answered, ‘I have spoken openly for all the world to hear; I have always taught in the synagogue and in the Temple where all the Jews meet together: I have said nothing in secret.

The eight title is Jesus before the Sanhedrinr, with a footnote r that says “The accounts of Luke and of John enable us to distinguish: a preliminary trial before Annas, at night time, and a solemn session of the Sanhedrin on the following morning, Mt 27:1. Matthew and Mark describe the night episode in terms of the morning one which was the only formal and decisive meeting. But for an alternative chronology, cf. 26:17+” and  the following parallel texts:
1.       Mk 14:53-65 - They led Jesus off to the high priest, and all the chief priests and the elders and the scribes assembled together (v.53). Peter had followed him at a distance, right into the high priest’s palace, and was sitting with the attendants warming himself at the fire (v.54).The chief priests and the whole Sanhedrin were looking for evidence against Jesus on which they might pass the death-sentence. But they could not find any (v.55). Several, indeed, brought false evidence against him, but their evidence was conflicting (v. 56). Some stood up and submitted this false evidence against him(v. 57), “We heard him say, ‘I am going to destroy this temple made with hands, and in three days build another, not made with hands.’” (v. 58).But even on this point their evidence were conflicting (v.59).  The high priest rose before the assembly and questioned Jesus, saying, “Have you no answer? What are these men testifying against you?” (v. 60)  But he was silent and answered nothing. Again the high priest asked him and said to him, “Are you the Messiah, the son of the Blessed One?” (v. 61) ‘I am,’ said Jesus ‘and you will see the Son of Man seated at the right hand of the Power and coming with the clouds of heaven(v. 62).The high priest tore his robes, “What  need of witnesses  have we now? (v. 63).You have heard the blasphemy. What is your finding?” And they all gave their verdict: he deserved to die (v.64).
2.       Lk 22:54-55, 66-71 - When day broke there was a meeting of the elders of the people,p attended by the chief priests and scribes. He was brought before their council (v. 66),and they said to him, “If you are the Christ, tell us.”  “If I tell you,’he replied ‘you will not believe (v. 67),and if I question you, you will not answer (v. 68). But from now on, the Son of Man willbeq seated at the right hand of the power of God (v. 69).’Then they all said, “So you are the Son of God then?” He answered, “It is you who say that I am (v. 70).”‘What need of witnesses have we now?’  they said, ‘We have heard it for ourselves from his own lips (v. 71).”Footnotep says “‘elder’ here means the whole Sanhedrin, not merely one of its three component bodies (the elders); of these, Lk names the two most influential (chief priests and scribes).”; and Footnoteq says “Lk omits the ‘you will see’ of Mt and Mk and also the allusion to Dn.”

Verses 57 and 58 say: The men who had arrested Jesus led him off to Caiaphas the high priest, where the scribes and the elders were assembled.Peter followed him at a distance, and when he reached high priest’s palace, hewent in and sat down with the attendants to see what the end would be.

Parallel text is Jn 18:13-16,18, 24 that say:They took him first to Annas, because Annas was the father-in-law of Caiaphas, who was high priest that year (v. 13).  It was Caiaphas who had suggested to the Jews, ‘It is better for one man to die for the people’ (v. 14). Simon Peter, with another discipleb followed Jesus. The disciple who was known to the high priest, went with Jesus into the high priest’s palace (v. 15), but Peter stayed outside the door. So the other disciple,  the one known to the high priest, went out, spoke to the woman who was keeping the and brought Peter in (v.16). Now it was cold, and the servants and guards had lit a charcoal fire and were standing there warming themselves; so Peter stood there too, warming himself with the others (v. 18). Then Annas sent him, still bound, to Caiphas the high priest (v. 24).c Footnotec  says “The Jewish leaders, Caiaphas in particular, 11:51f; 18:14, but also Judas who betrayed him to them, 6:71; 13:2,11,21; 18:2,5.”

Verses 59, 60 and 61 say:The chief priests and the whole Sanhedrin were for evidence  against Jesus, however false, on which they might pass the death sentence. But they could not find any, though several lying witnesses came forward. Eventually two stepped forward, and made a statement, “This man said, ‘I have power to destroy the Temple of God and in three days build it up s.’” Footnote s says “What Jesus had in fact foretold was the destruction of the Temple and of the Jewish cult of which it was the symbol, ch. 24. A new Temple was to be substituted for the old one, and this was to be, in the first place, his own body risen after three days, 16:21; 17:23; 20:19; Jn. 2:19-22, but beyond that, it was to be the Church.”

Parallel texts for verse 59 are:
1.       Ps 35:11 - Lying witnesses take the stand, questioning me on things I know nothing about...
2.       Jr 26 - Jeremiah’s discourse against the Temple: his arrest and condemnationa. Footnotea  says“The biographical passages may be attributed to Baruch: here he summarizes the discourse against the Temple, 7:1-15, and tells of what followed it.”
3.       Ac 25:7 - As soon as Paul appeared, the Jews who had come down from Jerusalem surrounded him, making many serious accusations against him which they were unable to substantiate.

Verse 62 says: The high priest then stood up and said to him, “Have you no answer to that? What is this evidence  these men are bringing against you?”t.Footnotet says “Vulg. Presents this as one question ‘Do you make no answer to the evidence these men are bringing against you?’.

Parallel texts for verse 62 are:
1.       Jn 2:19 - Jesus answered, ‘Destroy this sanctuary, and in three days I will raise it up’h. Footnote h says “In the Fourth Gospel, Jesus frequently uses terms which, in addition to their obvious meaning appreciated by the audience, possess a metaphorical and higher sense; cf. 2:20 (Temple); 3:4 (new birth); 4L15 (living water); 6:34 (bread of life); 7:35 (to depart); 11:11 (to awaken); 12:34 (to lift up); 13:9 (to wash); 13:36f (to depart); 14:22 (to show oneself). Consequent misapprehensions provide an opportunity for explanatory developments, cf. 3:11+.”
2.       Ac 6:14 - We have heard him say that Jesus the Nazarene is going to destroy this Place and alter the traditions that Moses handed down to us.’iFootnoteisays“The ‘false witnesses’ at the trial of Jesus similarly objected that he ‘would destroy the Temple’. There also a similarity in the climax of the two trials, Ac 7:56-57; Mt 26:62-66. The allegations concerning Mosaic practice will be made in Apostle Paul’s case also, Ac 15:1,5; 21:21,28; 25:8; 28:17.”

Verse 63 says: But Jesus was silent. And the high priest said to him, ‘I put you on oath by the living God  to tell us if you are the Christ, the Son of God.’

Parallel texts are:
1.       Mt 27:14 - But to the governor’s complete amazement, he offered no reply him of the charges.
2.       Is 53:7 - Harshly dealt with, he bore it humbly, he never opened his mouth, like a lamb that is led to the slaughterhouse, like a sheep dumbed before its shearers, never opening his mouth.
3.       Mt 4:3 - and the tempter came and said to him, ‘If you are the Son of God,ctell these stones to turn into loaves’.Footnotec  says“The biblical title ‘Son of God’ does not necessarily mean natural sonship but may imply a sonship which is merely adoptive, i.e., which as a result of God’s deliberate choice sets up a very intimate relationship between God and his creature. In this sense the title is given to angels (Jb. 1:6), to the Chosen People (Ex. 4:22, Ws. 18:13), to individual Israelites (Dt. 14:1, Ho. 2:1, cf. Mt. 5:9,48, etc.), to their leaders (Ps. 82:6). Were therefore it is attributed to the royal Messiah (1 Ch. 17:13, Ps. 2:7, 89:26) it does not necessarily imply that he is more than man; nor need we suppose that it has any deeper significance when used by Satan (Mt. 4:3,6) or by the possessed (Mk. 3:11, 5:7, Lk. 4:41), still less when used by the centurion (Mk. 15:39, cf. Lk. 23:47). By itself the sentence at baptism (Mt. 3:17) and at the transfiguration (17:5) suggests no more than the divine predilection for the Messiah-servant, and all probability the High priest’s question (26:63) concerns messiahship only. Nevertheless the title ‘Son of God’ can bear a further, more profound meaning of sonship in the full sense of the word. Jesus clearly insinuated this meaning when he spoke of himself as ‘the Son’ (2:37), ranked above the angels (24:36), having God for his ‘Father’ in a way others had not (Jn. 20:17 and cf. ‘my Father’ in Mt. 7:21, etc.), enjoying with the Father an altogether singular relationship of knowledge and love (Mt. 11:27). These assertions, coupled with others that speak of the Messiah’s divine rank (22:42-46), of the heavenly origin of the ‘son of  man’ (8:20+), assertions finally confirmed by the triumph of the resurrection, have endowed the expression ‘son of God’ with the strictly divine significance which will later be found, e.g. in Paul (Rm. 9:5+). During the lifetime of Christ, it is true his disciples had no clear conception of his divinity – the texts of Mt. 14:33 and 16:16 which add the title ‘Son of God’ to the more primitive text of Mk reflect, in all probability, a later stage in the faith’s development. But it is equally true that Jesus expressed with his own lips and with as much clarity as his audience could support, his own consciousness of being Son of the Father in the fullest sense. On these historical utterances the faith of the disciples rested, a faith that reached its perfection after the resurrection with the help of the Holy Spirit.”

Verses 64, 65 and 66 say: “Your words are your own’, answered Jesus, ‘Moreover I tell you that from this time onward you will see ‘the Son of Man seated at the right hand of the Power and coming on the clouds of heaven.’u.At this, the high priest tore his clothes and said, “He has blasphemed.vWhat need of witnesses have we now? There! You have just heard the blasphemy. ‘What is your opinion?” They answered, “He deserves to die!Footnoteu  says“‘The Power’ is equivalent to ‘Yahweh’. At the critical moment Jesus abandons his policy of the ‘messianic secret’, cf. Mk 1:34+, and unequivocally acknowledges - as he had already acknowledged to his intimates, Mt 16:16 - that he is the Messiah. But he goes further and reveals himself, not as the human Messiah of traditional expectation but as the Lord of Ps 110, cf. Mt 22:41f, and the mysterious personage of heavenly origin whom Daniel had seen in vision, cf Mt 8:20+. Henceforth the Jews will not see him except in his glory which will be manifested first in the victory of the resurrection and subsequently in the victory of the Church. Cf 23:39 and 24:30”; and Footnote v  says “The ‘blasphemy’ lay not in Jesus’ claim to be Messiah but in his claim to divine rank.”

Parallel texts for verse 64 are:
1.       Mt 8:20 - Jesus replied, ‘Foxes have holes and the birds of the air have nests, but the Son of Manh has nowhere to lay his head.’ Footnote h says “ With the exception of Ac 7:56, Rv 1:13; 14:14; this title appears only in the  gospels. There is no doubt that Jesus used it of himself, and indeed preferred it to others. At times he uses it to express his lowly state, 8:20; 11:19; 20:28, especially the humiliation of the Passion, 17:22, etc. At others times it is used to proclaim the definitive triumph of his resurrection, 17:9, of his return in glory, 24:30; of his coming in judgment, 25:31. That this title, Aramaic in flavor, could bring together these seemingly  opposed qualities is clear from the following considerations. The phrase originally meant ‘man’, Ezk. 2:1+, and by reason of its unusual and indirect form it underlined the lowliness of man’s state. But the title suggested glory, too. It was used in Dn 7:13+, and later in the Jewish apocalyptic Book of Enoch, to indicate the transcendent figure, heavenly in origin, who was to receive from God’s hand the eschatological kingdom (the kingdom ‘at the end of times’). In this way therefore the title both veiled and hinted at (cf. Mk. 1:34+; Mt. 13:13+) the sort of Messiah Jesus was. Moreover, the explicit avowal in the presence of the Sanhedrin, 26:64+, should have removed all ambiguity.”
2.       Mt 24:30 - And then the sign of the Son of Man will appear in heaven;o then too all the peoples of the earth will beat their breasts; and they will see the Son of Man coming on the clouds of heaven with power and great glory.p Footnote o  says “For the Fathers this ‘sign’ was Christ’s cross but possibly it is Christ himself proving by the triumph of his kingdom on earth that he has truly risen and is in glory.”; and Footnote p  says “In these words Daniel foretold the establishment of the messianic kingdom by a Son of Man coming on the clouds. The cloud is the usual accompaniment of both OT and NT theophanies: Ex. 13:22+; 19:16+; 34:5+; Lv 16:2; 1 K 8:10-11; Ps 18:11; 97:2; 104:3; Is 19:1; Jr. 4:13Ezk 1:4; 10:3f; 2 M 2:8. For NT, cf. Mt 17:5; Ac 1:9,11; 1 Th 4:17; Rv 1:7; 14:14.”
3.       Ps 110:1 - The Messiah: king and priesta . Yahweh’s oracle to you, my Lord, ‘Sit at my right handb and I will make your enemies a footstoolc  for you. Footnote a  says “The prerogatives of the Messiah, worldwide sovereignty and perpetual priesthood, cf. 2 S 7:1+; Zc 6:12-13, are no more conferred by earthly investiture than were those of the mysterious Melchizedek (Gn 14:18+. V. 1 is accepted in the NT epistles and elsewhere as a prophecy of the ascension of Christ to the right hand of the Father.”; Footnote b  says “The risen Christ is seated at the right hand of the Father, Rm 8:34, Heb 10:12, 1 P 3:22.”; and Footnote c  says “Cf. Jos 10:24; Dn 7:14.”
4.       Dn7:13 -‘I gazed into the vision of the night. And I saw, coming on the clouds of heaven, one like a son of man.k He came to the one of great age and was led into his presence. Footnote k  says “Like the Hebrew ben adam, the Aram. Bar nasha used here, has the primary meaning ‘man’, cf. Ps 8:4. In Ezk. God addresses the prophet thus. But here in Dn the expression signifies a man who is mysteriously more than human. That it indicates an individual is attested by early Jewish apocryphal writings (Enoch, 2 Esd) inspired by this passage, as also by rabbinical tradition from the 2nd to the 9th centuries, and most particularly by Jesus, who applies it to himself, cf. Mt 8:20+. That it has a collective sense also is deduced from v. 18 (and v. 22) where the ‘son of man’ and the saints of the Most High’ seem more or less identified. But the collective (and equally messianic sense is an extension of the individual sense; the ‘son of man’ being leader, representative and exemplar of the saints of the Most High. It was with this in mind that St. Ephraim believed that the prophecy applied first to the Jews (the Maccabees), but beyond this, and perfectly, to Jesus.”
5.       Ac 2:33+ - Now raised to the heights by God’s right hand,s he has received from the father the Holy Spirit, who was promised,t and what you see and hear is the outpouring of that Spirit. Footnote s says “Words borrowed from Ps. 118 (v.16 LXX ‘The right hand of the Lord has raised me up’) used in their preaching by the apostles who took it to be messianic: Ac 4:11, 1 P 2:7, Mt 21:9p,42p, 23:39, Lk 13:35, Jn 12:13, Heb 13:6. But it is possible to translate. ‘ Having raised up to the right hand of God’ and to se in this an introduction to the quotation (v.34) of Ps. 110); which is another name of Apostolic preaching: Mt. 22:44p,26:64p, Mk 16:19, Ac 7:55,56, Rm 8:34, 1Co. 15:25, Ep. 1:20 Col. 3:1, Heb. 1:3,13, 8:1, 10:12, 12:2, 1 P.3:22.”; and Footnote t  says “According to the prophets, the gif of the Spirit would characterize  the messianic era, Ex. 36:27+. Peter explains the miracle his bearers have witnessed as the ‘pouring out’ of this spirit, foretold in Jl 3:1-2 by the risen Christ.”
6.       Ac 7:55 - But Stephen, filled with the Holy Spirit, gazed into heaven and saw the glory of God, and Jesus standing at God’s right hand.q. Footnote q  says “Stephen’s vision is to be related to his transfiguration, 6:15+.”

Verses 67 and 68 say: Then they spat in his face and hit him with their fists; others said as the struck him, ‘Play the prophet, Christ! Who hit you then?’

Parallel texts for verse 67 are:
1.       Ws 2:19 - Let us test him with cruelty and with torture, and thus explore this gentleness of  his and put his endurance to proof.
2.       Is 50:6- I gave my back to those who beat me,my cheeks to those who tore out my beard; My face I did not hide from insults and spitting.e Footnote e  says “The description of the servant’s suffering recurs in the fourth song, 52:13-53:12.”
3.       Is 52:14 - As the crowds were appalled on seeing himl, so disfigured did he look that he seemed no longer humanm. Footnote l  says “‘On seeing him’ Targ, and Syr.; ‘on seeing you’ Hebr.”; and Footnote m  says  “A DSIa variant suggests the translation ‘By my anointing I took his human appearance from him’.”
The ninth title is “Peter’s denials”, with the following parallel texts:
1.       Mk 14:53-72 - They led Jesus off to the high priest, and all the chief priests and the elders and the scribes assembled together (v.53). Peter had followed him at a distance, right into the high priest’s palace, and was sitting with the attendants warming himself at the fire (v.54).The chief priests and the whole Sanhedrin were looking for evidence against Jesus on which they might pass the death-sentence. But they could not find any (v.55). Several, indeed, brought false evidence against him, but their evidence was conflicting (v. 56). Some stood up and submitted this false evidence against him(v. 57), “We heard him say, ‘I am going to destroy this temple made with hands, and in three days build another, not made with hands.’” (v. 58).But even on this point their evidence were conflicting (v.59).  The high priest rose before the assembly and questioned Jesus, saying, “Have you no answer? What are these men testifying against you?”b  (v. 60)  But he was silent and answered nothing. Again the high priest asked him and said to him, “Are you the Messiah, the son of the Blessed One?” (v. 61)c ‘I am,’ said Jesus ‘and you will see the Son of Man seated at the right hand of the Power and coming with the clouds of heaven(v. 62).The high priest tore his robes, “What  need of witnesses  have we now? (v. 63).You have heard the blasphemy. What is your finding?” And they all gave their verdict: he deserved to die (v.64).Some of them started spitting at him and, blindfolding him, began hitting him with their fists and shouting, “Play the prophet.” And the attendants raised blows on him (v. 65). While Peter was down below in the courtyard, one of the high priest’s servant girls came up (v. 66). She saw Peter warming himself there, started at him and said, ‘You too were with Jesus, the man from Nazareth’ (v. 67).  But he denied it. ‘I do not know, I do not understand, what you are talking about’ he said. And he went out into the forecourt (v. 68)d The servant-girl saw him and again started telling the bystanders, ‘This fellow is one of them’ (v. 69). But again he denied it. A little later the bystanders themselves said to Peter, ‘You are one of them for sure! Why, you are a Galilean’ (v. 70). But he started calling down curses on himself and swearing, ‘I do not know the man you speak of’ (v. 71). At that moment the cock crew for the second time, and Peter recalled how Jesus had said to him, ‘Before the cock crows twice, you will have disowned me three times’. And he burst into tears (v. 72).  Footnote b says “Here, and in Mt 26:62, some translate ‘Do you make no reply to the charges these men are bringing against you?’”; Footnote c says “‘The Blessed One’ (cf. also ‘the Power’, v. 62) is a substitute for the name ‘Yahweh’ which the Jews would not pronounce.”; and Footnote d says “Add. (Vulg.) ‘and a cock crew’.
2.       Lk 22:54-62 - They seized him thenm and led him away; and they took him to the high priest’s house. Peter followed at a distance (v. 54). They had lit a fire in the middle of the courtyard and Peter sat down among them (v. 55). and as he was sitting there by the blaze a servant girl saw him, peered at him, and said, ‘This person was with him too (v. 56)’. But he denied it. “Woman,’ he said, ‘I do not know him (v. 57).”Shortly afterwards someone else saw him and said, ‘You are another of them.’ But Peter replied, ‘I am not, my friend.’n (v. 58). About an hour later another insisted, saying, “This fellow was certainly with him. Why,  he is a Galilean (v. 59).’ “My friend,’ Peter said, I do not know what you are talking about.” At that instant, while he was speaking, the cock crew (v. 60),and the Lord turned and looked straight at Peter, and Peter remembered what the Lord had said to him, “Before the cock crows today, you will deny me three times’ (v. 61). And he went outside and wept bitterly (v. 62). Footnote m   says “In Mt and Mk Jesus is seized immediately after Judas’ greeting; the sword episode follows, and finally the discourse by Jesus. Lk makes the arrest follow the discourse, thus emphasizing the control Jesus has over what takes place. Cf for the same emphasis, Jn 10:18+; 18:4-6.”; Footnote n  says “Lit. ‘man’.”
3.       Jn 18:15-16,18,24-27 - Simon Peter, with another discipleb followed Jesus. The disciple who was known to the high priest, went with Jesus into the high priest’s palace (v. 15), but Peter stayed outside the door. So the other disciple,  the one known to the high priest, went out, spoke to the woman who was keeping the and brought Peter in (v.16) The maid on duty at the door said to Peter, “Aren’t you another of that man’s disciples?” He answered, “I am not (v. 17).”Now it was cold, and  the servants and guards had lit a charcoal fire and were standing there were warming themselves; so Peter stood there too,  warming himself with the others (v. 18).As Simon Peter stood there warming himself, someone said to him, “Aren’t you another of his disciples?” He denied it saying, “I am not.”(v. 25).One of the high priest’s servants, a relation of the man whose ear Peter had cut off, said, “Didn’t I see you in the garden with him?” And again Peter denied it; and at once a cock crew (v.27). Footnote b says “Probably the disciple of 20:2f, whom Jesus loved’, the evangelist himself.

Verses 69 and 70 say: Meanwhile Peter was sitting outside in the courtyard, and a servant girl came up to him and said, “You too were with Jesus the Galilean.  ”But he denied it in front of them all. “I do not know what you are talking about’, he said.

Parallel text for verse 70 is Mt 8:10 that says: When Jesus heard this he was astonished and said to those following him, ‘I tell you solemnly, nowhere in Israel have I found faithb like this. Footnote b  says “The faith that Jesus asks for from the outset of public life (Mk. 1:15) and throughout his subsequent career, is that act of trust and self-abandonment by which people no longer rely on their own strength and policies but commit themselves to the power and guiding word of him in whom they believe (Lk. 1:20,45; Mt. 21:25p,32). Christ asks for this faith especially when he works his miracles (8:13; 9:2p; 22p, 28-29; 15:28; Mk 5:36p;10:52p; Lk 17:19) which are not so much acts of mercy as signs attesting his mission and witnessing to the kingdom (8:3+; cf. Jn 2:11+), hence he cannot work miracles unless he finds the faith without which the miracle lose their true significance (13:58p; 12;38-39; 16:1-4). Since the faith demands the sacrifice of the whole man, mind and heart, it is not an easy act of humility to perform; many decline it, particularly in Israel (8:10p; 15:28; 27:42p; Lk 18;8), or are half-hearted (Mk 9;24; Lk 8;13). Even the disciples are slow to believe (8:26p; 14;31; 18;8; 17:20p) and are still reluctant after the resurrection (28;17; Mk 16:11-14; Lk 24;11,25,41). The most generous faith of all, of the ‘Rock’ (16:16-18), the disciples leader, was destined to the shaken by the outrage of the Passion (26:69-75p) though it was to triumph in the end (Lk 22:32). When faith is strong it works wonders (17:20p; 21:21p; Mk 16:17) and its appeal is never refused (21:22p; Mk 9:23) especially when it asks for forgiveness of sin (9:2p; Lk 7:50) and for that salvation of which it is the necessary condition (Lk 8;12; Mk 16:16, cf. Ac 3:16+).

Verses 71 and 72 say: When he went out to the gateway another servant girl saw him and said to the people there, ‘This man was with Jesus the Nazarenew’ And again, with an oath, he denied it. ‘I do not know the man. Footnote w says “Nazoraios, var. (cf. Vulg.) Nazarenos.”

Parallel text for verse 71 is Mt 2:23 that say: There he settled in a town called Nazareth. In this way the words spoken through the prophets where to be fulfilled: “He shall be called a Nazarene.”j Footnote says  “Nazoraios: this is the form used by Mt, Jn. and Ac. (translated Nazarene throughout this version). Nazarenos (‘of Nazareth’ in this version) is used by Mk. Lk. uses both forms. These two synonyms  were current transcriptions of an Aramaic adjective (nasraya) itself derived from the name of the town “Nazareth’ (Nasrath). Applied to Jesus, whose origin it indicated (26:69,71), and later to his followers (Ac. 24:5), the term became common in the semitic world for the disciples of Jesus; the name ‘Christian’ (Ac. 11:26) prevailed in the Graeco-Roman world. It is not clear  which prophetic oracles Mt. alludes to; possibly to the nazir of Jg. 13:5,7.”
Verses 73 and 74 say: A little later the bystanders came up and said to Peter, “You are one of them for sure! Why, your accentx gives you away.’ Then he started calling down curses on himself and swearing, “I do not know the man.” At that moment the cock crew… Footnote x  says “The Galilean accent.”

Parallel text is Jg 12:6 that says: …they said, ‘Then say Shibboleth’.c He would say ‘Sibboleth’, since he could not pronounce the word correctly. Thereupon they seized and slaughtered him by the fords of the Jordan. There perished in this way forty-two thousand men of Ephraim. Footnote c  says “Shibboleth means either ‘an ear of corn or a flowing stream’. The Ephraimites were betrayed by their mispronunciation.”

Verse 75 says: and Peter remembered what Jesus had said, “Before the cock crows you will have disowned me three times’. And he went outside and wept bitterly.

Parallel text is  Mt 26:34 that says: Jesus answered him, ‘I tell you solemnly, this very night, before the cock crows, you will have disowned me three times’.

Tenth title is “Jesus is taken before Pilate”.

Chapter 27, verse 1 says: When morning came, all the chief priests and the elders of the people met in council to bring about the death of Jesus.

Parallel texts are:
1.       Mk 15:1 - First thing I the morning, the chief priests together with the elders and scribes, in short the whole Sanhedrin, had their plan ready. They had Jesus bound and took him away and handed him over to Pilate.
2.       Lk 22:66 - When day broke there was a meeting of the elders of the people,p attended by the chief priests and scribes. He was brought before their council… Footnote p says “‘elder’ here means the whole Sanhedrin, not merely one of its three component bodies (the elders); of these, Lk names the two most influential (chief priests and scribes).” 
3.       Lk 23:1 - The whole assembly then rose, and they brought him before Pilate.

Verse 2 says: They had him bound, and led him away to hand him over to Pilate,a the governor.  Footnote a  says “Var ‘Pontius Pilate’, Cf. Lk 3:1+. In Judaea, as in all the provinces of the Empire, Rome reserved to itself power of life and death: the Jews had to approach this magistrate for confirmation and execution of the sentence they had promulgated.”

Parallel texts are:
1.       Mt 26:57 - The men who had arrested Jesus led him off to Caiaphas the high priest, where the scribes and the elders were assembled.
2.       Jn 18:28 - They then led Jesus from the house of Caiphas to the Praetorium.d It was now morning. They did not go into the Praetorium themselves or they would be defilede and unable to eat the passover. Footnote d  says “The Roman procurator’s judicial court.”; and Footnote e  says “To enter a pagan house was to incur legal impurity, cf. Ac 11:2f.”
3.       Lk 3:1 - The preaching of John the Baptist. In the fifteenth year of Tiberius Caesar’s reign,a when Pontius Pilateb was governor of Judaea, Herodc tetrarch of Galilee, his brother Philipd tetrarch of the land of Ituraea and Trachonitis, Lysaniase tetrarch of Abilene…Footnote a  says “Here, as in 1:5 and 2:1-3, Lk dates his narrative by secular events. Tiberius succeeded Augustus, 2:1, on 19 August 14 AD. The 15th year, therefore, is from 19 August 28 AD to 18 August 29 AD. Alternatively, if the Syrian method of calculating the year of a reign is being followed, the 15th year is from Sept-Oct 27 AD to Sept-Oct 28 AD. At that time, Jesus was at least 33 years old, possibly 35 or 36. The indication of v. 23 is approximate, and perhaps it only means that Jesus was old enough to exercise a public ministry. The mistake in calculating the ‘Christian Era’ results from taking 3:23 as an exact figure: the 15th year of Tiberius was 782 ‘after the foundation of Rome’; Dionysius Exiguus subtracted 29 full years from this, arriving at 753 for the beginning of our era. Actually, it should have been 750 or even 746.”;  Footnote b  says “Procurator of Judaea (including Idumaea and Samaria) 26-36 AD.”; Footnote c  says “The Herod referred to is Herod Antipas, son of Herod the Great and Malthake; he was tetrarch of Galilee and Peraea from 4 BC to 39 AD.”; Footnote  d  says “Son of Herod the Great and Cleopatra, tetrarch from 4 BC to 34 AD.”; and Footnote e  says “Known from two inscriptions. Abilene was in Anti-Lebanon”.

The eleventh title is “The death of Judas.”  

Verses 3 and 4 say: When he found that Jesus had been condemned, Judas his betrayer was filled with great remorse and took the thirty  silver pieces back to the chief priests and elder. “I have sinned’, he said ‘I have betrayed innocent blood.”b ‘What is that to us?’ they replied ‘That is your concern.’ Footnote c  says “Thirty shekels – and not thirty denarii as is commonly said. It was the price the Law fixed for a slave’s life, Ex. 21:32.”; and Footnote  b says “Var. ‘righteous blood’, cf. 23:35.”

Parallel text is Mt 26:15 that says: and said, “What are you prepared to give me if I hand him over to you?” They paid him thirty  silver pieces,c Footnote c  says “Thirty shekels – and not thirty denarii as is commonly said. It was the price the Law fixed for a slave’s life, Ex. 21:32.”

Verses 5 to 10 say: And flinging down the  silver pieces in the sanctuary he made off and went and hanged himself. The chief priests picked up the  silver pieces and said, ‘It is against the law to put this into the treasury; it is  blood money’. So they discussed the matter and bought the potter’s field with it as a graveyard for foreigners, and this is why the field is called the Field of Bloodc today. The words of the prophet Jeremiahd were then fulfilled: And they took the thirty  silver  pieces, the value at which the precious One was priced by the children of Israel, and they gave them the potter’s field, just as the Lord directed me.e Footnote c says “In Aramaic Hakeldama (cf. Ac 1:19 and Vulg. In this place). A 4th Century tradition, probably reliable, locates it in the Valley of Gehinnom”; Footnote d says “Om. ‘Jeremiah’. Actually this is a free quotation from Zc 11:12-13 combined with the idea of the purchase of a field, an idea suggested by Jr 32:6-15. This, plus the fact that Jeremiah speaks of potters (18:2f) who lived in the Hakeldama district (19:1f), explains how the whole text could by approximation be attributed to Jeremiah.”; and Footnote e  says “Yahweh complained that, in the person of his prophet Zechariah, he had received from the Israelites a wage that was nothing but an insult. The sale of Jesus Christ for the same paltry sum appeals to Matthew as a fulfillment of this oracle of the prophet.”

Parallel text is  Ac 1:18 that say: As you know, he bought a field with the money he was paid for his crime. He fell headlong and burst open, and all his entrails poured out.

The twelfth title is  “Jesus before Pilate”.

Verse 11 says: Jesus then, was brought before the governor, and the governor put this question, “Are you the king of the Jews?” Jesus said, “It is you who say itf. Footnote f  says “By these words Jesus acknowledges as correct, at least in a sense, what he would never have said on his own initiative. See above 26:25,64; and cf. Jn 18:33-37+.”

Parallel texts are:
1.       Mk 15:2-5 - Pilate questioned him, “Are you the king of the Jews?”“It was you who say it” he answered (v. 2). And the chief priests brought many  accusations against him (v. 3). Pilate questioned him again, “Have you no reply at all? See how many accusations they are brining against you (v . 4).But to Pilate’s amazement, Jesus made no further reply (v. 5).

2.       Lk 23:2-5,13-25 - They began their accusation by saying, ‘We found this man inciting our people to revolt, opposing payment of the tribute to Caesar and claiming to be Christ, a king (v. 2).’Pilate put to him this question, ‘Are you the king of the Jews?’ ‘It is you who say it,’ he replied (v. 3). Pilate then said to the chief priests and the crowds, “I find no case against this man (v. 4).”But they persisted, ‘He is inflaming the people with his teaching all over Judea; it has come all the way from Galilee, where he started, down to here (v. 5).’Pilate then summoned the chief priests, the leading men and the people (v. 13).“You brought this man to me,’ he said ‘as apolitical agitator. Now I have gone the matter myself in your presence and not found no case against the man in respect of all the charges you have bring against him (v. 14).Nor has Herod either, since he sent him back to us. As you can see, the man has done nothing that deserves death (v. 15),So I shall have him flogged and then let himgo.d (v. 16).But as one man they howled, “Away with him! Give us Barabbas!” (v. 18).(This man had been thrown into prison for causing a riot  in the city and for murder) (v. 19).Pilate was anxious to set Jesus free and addressed them again (v.,20).but they shouted back, “Crucify him! Crucify him!” (v. 21).And for the third timee he spoke to them, “Why? What harm has this man done? I have found him no case against him that deserves death, so I shall have him punished and then let himgo.”f (v. 22).But they kept on shouting at the top of their voice, demanding that he should be crucified. And their  shouts were growing louder (v. 23).Pilate then gave his verdict: their demand was to be granted (v. 24). He released the man they asked for, who had been imprisoned for rioting and murder, and he handed Jesus over to them to deal with as they pleased (v. 25). Footnote d  says “Add v. 17 ‘He was under obligation to release one man for them every feast day’; this seem to be an explanatory gloss, cf Mt 27:15p.”; Footnote e says “Lk, like Jn, emphasizes Pilate’s wish to let Jesus go free, and mentions the procurator’s  declaration of Christ’s innocence three times, cf. Jn 18:38; 19:4,6.”; and Footnote f says “Cf. v. 16. Lk does not say what the punishment was: in Mt. 27:27-31p it is scourging. Unlike Mt. and Mk, but like Jh, Lk regards the punishment as a conciliatory measure designed to avert a sentence not yet pronounced.”
3.       Jn 18:28-40; 19:4-16 - And with that he went out again to the Jews and  said,  “I find no case against him (v.38b) But according to a custom of yours I should release one prisoner at the Passover, would you like me, then,  to release the King of the Jews?” (v. 39). At this they shouted: “Not this man,’ they said ‘but Barabbas!” Barabbas was a brigand.19:1Pilate then had Jesus taken away and scourged (v. 1); and after this, the soldiers twisted some thorns into a crown and put it on his head, and dressed him in a purple robe (v. 2). They kept coming up to him and saying, ‘Hail, King of the Jews!’;and they slapped him on the face (v.3). Pilate came outside again and said to them, “Look, I am going to bring him out to you to let you see that I find no case.”a (v. 4).  Jesus then came out wearing the crown of thorns and the purple robe. Pilate said, “Here is the man (v. 5). When  they saw him the chief priests and the guards shouted, “Crucify him! crucify him!” Pilate said, “Take him yourselves and crucify him. I can find no case against  him (v. 6)” “We have a law,’ the Jews replied, ‘and according to that Law he ought to die, because he had claimed to be the Son of God (v. 7). When Pilate heard them say this his fears increased (v. 8). Reentering the Praetorium, he said to Jesus, “Where do you come from?”b But Jesus made no answer (v. 9). Pilate then said to him, “Are you refusing to speak to me? Surely you know I have power to release you and I have power to crucify you? (v. 10) [him], “You would have not power over me’ replied Jesus ‘if it had not been given to you from above;  that is why the one who handed me over to you has the greater guilt.”c (v. 11) Consequently, Pilate tried to release him; but the Jews cried out, “If you release him, you are not a Friend of Caesar. Everyone who makes himself a king opposes Caesar.” (v. 12). When Pilate heard these words he brought Jesus out and seated him on the judge’s bench in the place called Stone Pavement, in Hebrew, Gabbatha (v. 13). It was Passover Preparation Daye about the sixth hourf (v. 14).They cried out, “Take him away, take him away! Crucify him!” Pilate said to them, “Shall I crucify your king?” The chief priests answered, “We have no king but Caesar (v.15)”Then he handed him over to them to be crucified (v. 16).

Footnote


4.       Mt 27:29 - And having twisted some thorns into a crown they put this on his head and placed a reed in his right hand. To make fun of him they knelt to him saying, ‘Hail, king of the Jews!’

Verses 12 and 13 say: But when he was accused by the chief priests and elders, he refused to answer at all. Pilate then said to him, “Do you not hear how many charges they have brought against you?”.

Parallel text is Ws 2:19 that says:  Let us test him with cruelty and with torture, and thus explore this gentleness of  his and put his endurance to proof.

Verse 14 says: But to the governor’s complete amazement, he offered no reply him of the charges.

Parallel texts are:
1.       Mt 26:63 - But Jesus was silent. And the high priest said to him, ‘I put you on oath by the living God  to tell us if you are the Christ, the Son of God.’
2.       Is 53:7 - Harshly dealt with, he bore it humbly, he never opened his mouth, like a lamb that is led to the slaughterhouse, like a sheep dumbed before its shearers, never opening his mouth.

Verse 15 to 24 say: At festival time it was the governor’s practice to release a prisoner for the people, anyone they chose. Now there wasg at that time a notorious prisoner whose namewas  Barabbas.h So when the crowd gathered, Pilate said to them, “Which do you want me to release for you: Barabbas, or Jesus called Christ?”. For Pilate knew it was out of jealousy that they had handed him over. Now as he was  seated in the chair of judgment, his wife sent him a message, “Have nothing to do with that man; I have been upset all day by a dream I had about him.” The chief priests and the elders, however, had persuaded the crowds to demand the release of Barabbas and  the execution of Jesus. So when the governor spoke and asked them, “Which of the two do you want me to release for you?” they said, “Barabbas!”. ‘But in that case,’ Pilate said to them, ‘what am I do with Jesus who is called Christ?” They all said, “Let him be crucified!”. “Why? He asked ‘What harm has he done?” But they shouted all  the louder, “Let him be crucified!” (v.  23). Then Pilate saw that he was making no impression, that in fact a riot was imminent. So he took some water, washed his handsi in front of the crowd and said, “I am innocent of this man’s blood.j It is your concern.” Footnote g   says “Vulg. ‘he had’.”; Footnote h   says “Here and in v. 17, var. ‘Jesus Barabbas’, which would give peculiar point to Pilate’s question but appears to have its origin in apocryphal tradition."; Footnote i says “The significance of this gesture must have been well understood by the Jews, cf. Dt 21:6f; Ps 26:6; 73:13.”;  and  Footnote j  says “Var. ‘of the blood of the just man”.

Parallel text for verse 15 is Jn 18:39 that says: But according to a custom of yours I should release one prisoner at the Passover, would you like me, then,  to release the King of the Jews?”

Verse 25 says: And the people, to a man, shouted back, “His blood be on us and on our childrenk” Footnote k  says “Traditional OT phrase, 2 S 1:16; 3:29, cf. Ac 18:6, by which they accept responsibility for the death they demand.”

Parallel text is Ac 18:6 that says: When they turned against him and started to insult him, he took his cloak in front of themg saying, “Your blood be on your heads! I am clear of responsibility. From now on I will go to the pagans”. Footnote g  says “Symbolically breaking off relations. The following sentence is biblical, cf. Lv. 20:9-16; 2 S 1:16, and means that the Jews must accept full responsibility for the consequences. Their ‘blood’, i.e., their punishment, is not Paul’s affair; his conscience is clear (lit. ‘I am clean’).”

Verse 26 says: Then he released Barabbas for them. He ordered Jesus  to be scourged,l and then handed over to be crucified. Footnote l says “In Roman practice the normal prelude to crucifixion.”

Parallel texts are:
1.       Mt 23:35…and so you will draw down on yourselves the blood of every holy man that has been shed on earth, from the blood of Abel the holy blood of Zachariah son of Barachiahn whom you murdered between the sanctuary and the altar. Footnote n says The one referred to is probably the Zechariah of 2 Ch 24:20-22. His murder is the last one to be described in the Bible (2 Ch being the last book of the Jewish Canon) while Abel’s, Gn 4:8, is the first. It is possible that ‘son of Barachiah’ is a result of confusion with another Zechariah, cf. Is 8:2 (LXX); Zc 1:1. Alternatively, the words may be a copyist’s gloss.”
2.       Ac 5:28 - “We gave you a formal warning’ he said ‘ not to preach in this name.i You have filled Jerusalem with your teaching, and seem determined to fix the guilt of this man’s death on us.” Footnote I says “Western text ‘Did we not forbid you to preach I that name? and no…’ Then Peter answered, ‘Which must we obey, God or man? ‘God’ he said. And Peter then replied, ‘The God of our ancestors..’”

The thirteenth title is “Jesus is crowned with thorns”  with the following parallel texts:
1.       Mk 15:16-20 - The soldiers led him away to the inner part of the palace, that is, the Praetorium, and called the whole cohort together (v. 16). They dressed him up in purple, twisted some thorns into a crown and put it on him (v. 17). And they began saluting him, ‘Hail, king of the Jews! (v. 18). They struck his head with a reed and spat on him; and they went down on their knees to him homage (v. 19). And when they had finished making fun of him, they took off the purple and dressed him in his own clothes (v. 20).
2.       Jn 19:1-3 - Pilate then had Jesus taken away and scourged (v. 1); and after this, the soldiers twisted some thorns into a crown and put it on his head, and dressed him in a purple robe (v. 2). They kept coming up to him and saying, ‘Hail, King of the Jews!’; and they slapped him on the face (v.3).

Verses 27, 28 and 29 say: The governor’s soldiers took Jesus with them into the Praetoriumm and collected the whole cohort round him. Then they stripped him and made him wear a scarlet cloak,n
And having twisted some thorns into a crown they put this on his head and placed a reed in his right hand. To make fun of him they knelt t him saying, ‘Hail, king of the Jews!’. Footnote m says “The Praetorium, or residence of the praetor, was probably the former palace of King Herod the Great in which the procurator used to reside whenever he went up from Caesaria to Jerusalem. This palace situated in the W. quarter of the city, was not the family residence of the Hasmonaeans: this was near the Temple and in it Herod Antipas probably received Jesus, sent to him by Pilate, Lk 23:7-12. Some commentators think that the Praetorium was in the fortress called Antonia, to the N. of the Temple.”;  and Footnote n says “The Roman soldier’s cloak (sagum); being red it suggested the imperial purple to the mocking soldiery.””

Parallel text for verse 29 is Is 52:14 that says: As the crowds were appalled on seeing himl, so disfigured did he look that he seemed no longer humanm. Footnote l says …Footnote m  says “A DSIa variant suggests the translation ‘By my anointing I took his human appearance from him’.”

Verses 30 and 31 says: And they spat upon him and took the reed and struck him on the head with it. And when they had finished making fun of him, they took off the cloak, dressed him in his own clothes, and led him off to crucify him. And when they had finished making fun of him, they took off the cloak and dressed him in his own clothes and led him away to crucify him.

Parallel texts are:
1.       Mt 27:11 - Jesus then, was brought before the governor, and the governor put this question, “Are you the king of the Jews?” Jesus said, “It is you who say itf. Footnote f  says “By these words Jesus acknowledges as correct, at least in a sense, what he would never have said on his own initiative. See above 26:25,64; and cf. Jn 18:33-37+.”
2.       Is 50:6 - I gave my back to those who beat me, my cheeks to those who tore out my beard; My face I did not hide from insults and spitting.e Footnote e  says “The description of the servant’s suffering recurs in the fourth song, 52:13-53:12.”

The fourteenth title is “The crucifixion” with the following parallel texts:
1.       Mk 15:21-27 - They enlisted a passer-by, Simon of  Cyrene, father of Alexander and Rufusa who was coming in from the country,  to carry his cross (v.21). They brought Jesus to the place called Golgotha, which is means the place of the skull (v. 22).  They offered him wine mixed with myrrh, but he refused it (v.23). Then they crucified him and shared out his clothing, casting lots to decide what each should get (v.24). It was the third hourb when they crucified him (v. 25). The inscription giving charge against him read, “The King of the Jews” (v. 26). And  they crucified two robbers with him, one on his right and one on his leftc (v. 27). Footnote a says “Alexander and Rufus were doubtless known to the Roman circle in which Mark wrote his gospel. Cf. Rm 16:13.”; Footnote b says “9 a.m. or, more vaguely, sometime between 9 a.m. and noon.”; Footnote c says “Add. V. 28 ‘And the text of scripture was fulfilled that says: He was taken for a criminal’ (Is 53:12). CfLk 22:37.”
2.       Lk 23:26-34, 38 - As they were leading him away they seized on a man, Simon from a Cyrene, who was coming in from the country, and made him shoulder the cross  and carry it behind Jesus (v. 26). Large numbers of people followed him, and of women too,g who mourned and lamented for him (v. 27). But Jesus turned to them and said, “Daughters of Jerusalem, do not weep for me; weep rather for yourselves and for your children (v. 28). For the days will surely come when people will say, ‘Happy are those who are barren, the wombs that never borne, the breasts that never suckled (v. 29).’At that time people will say to the mountains, ‘Fall upon us!’ and to the hills, ‘Cover us! (v. 30) For if men use the green wood like this, what will happen when it is dry?h (v. 31). Now with him they were also leading out two other criminals to be executed (v. 32).The crucifixioni . When they reached the place called the Skull, they crucified him and the two criminals also, one on the right, the other on the left (v. 33). Then Jesus said, “Father, forgive them, they do not know what they are doing.” Then they cast lots to share out his clothing (v. 34). Above him there was an inscription: “This is the King of the Jews (v. 38). Footnote g says “The Talmud records that noblewomen of Jerusalem were accustomed to give soothing drinks to condemned criminals.”; Footnote h  says “If greenwood is burnt that is not meant for burning (allusion to Christ’s condemnation), what is to happen to the dry wood (the truly guilty).”; and Footnote i says “A comparison with Mk and Mt shows how Lk has softened the harshness of Calvary: Lk’s crowd, vv. 27,35,48, is more inquisitive than hostile, and repents in the end, v. 48; Jesus does not utter the seemingly despairing cry. ‘My God, my God, why have you deserted me?’; Christ’s ministry  of forgiveness goes on to the last, vv. 34, 39-43; he dies committing his spirit into the hands of his Father, v. 46.”
3.       Jn 19:17-24 - They then took charge of Jesus,h and carrying his own cross he went out of the city to the place of the skull, or, as  it is called in Hebrew, Golgotha (v.17),where they crucified him with two others, one on either side, with Jesus in the middle (v.18). Pilate  wrote out a notice and had it fixed on the cross; it ran, “Jesus the Nazarene, King of the Jews (v. 19) ‘. This notice was read by many of the Jews, because the place where Jesus was crucified was now far from the city, and the writing  was in Hebrew, Latin, and Greek (v.20). So the  Jewish chief priests said to Pilate, “You should not write ‘The King of the Jews,’ but ‘This man said: I am the King of the Jews’ (v. 21).  Pilate answered, “What I have written, I have written” (v.  22). When the soldiers had finished crucifying Jesus, they took his clothing and divided them into four shares, one for each soldier.  His undergarment was seamless,i woven in one piece, from neck to hem (v.23);so they said to one another, “Instead of tearing it, let’s throw dice to decide who is to have it”. In this way the words of scripture were fulfilled: “They shared out my clothing among them. They cast lots for my clothes.”  This is exactly what the soldiers did (v. 24). Footnote h  says “Add. ‘and led him away.’”; and Footnote i - Possible allusion to the priesthood of the crucified: the high priestly robe was without seam.

Verse 32, 33 and 34 say: On their way out, they came across a man from Cyrene, Simon by name, and enlisted him to carry his cross when they had reached a place called Golgotha,o that is, the place of the skull, they gave him wine to drink mixed with gall,p which he tasted but refused to drink. Footnote o says  “Approximate transliteration of the Aramaic word Golgotha, ‘a place of the skull’, in Lat.  Calvaria (whence Calvary).”; and  Footnote p says “A narcotic which sympathetic Jewish women (cf. Lk 23:27f) used to offer the condemned to diminish their sufferings. The wine was mixed with ‘myrrh’ (cf. Mk 15:23) rather than with ‘gall’. The ‘gall’ in Mt (like the correction of ‘wine’ to ‘vinegar’ in the Antiochene recension) is due to a reminiscence of Ps 69:21. Jesus refuses the palliative.”

Parallel texts for verse 34 are:
1.       Ps 69:21 - They gave me poison to eat instead, when I was thirsty they gave me vinegar to drink.
2.       Pr 31:6 - Procure a strong drink for a man about to perish, wine for the heart that is full of bitterness:

Verse 35 and 36 say: When they had finished crucifying him, they shared out his garments by casting lotsq; and then sat down and stayed there keeping guard over him. Footnote q says “Add. ‘that the saying of the prophet might be fulfilled: they divided my garments between them and for my robe they cast lots’ (Ps 22:18) a gloss taken from Jn 19:24.”

Parallel text is Ps 22:18 that says: They divided my  garments among them and cast lots for my clothes.

Verses 37 and 38 say: Above his head was placed the charge against him; it read: This is Jesus, the King of the Jews. At the same time two robbers were crucified with him, one on the right and one on the left.

Parallel texts are:
1.       Is 53:9,13 - They gave him a grave with the wicked, a tomb with therichg, though he had done no wrong, and there had been no perjury in his mouth. Footnote g  says “With DSIa, Hebr. ‘in his death he is with the rich man’. Early Christian preaching seems to have had this text in mind when recording the burial of Jesus in the tomb of Joseph Arimathea, ‘a rich man’, Mt 27:57-60. It is possible to correct to ‘in his death he is with the evil-doers’, Lk. 22:37 which, however, refers rather to v. 12.”
2.       Lk 23:37 - they said, “If you are King of the Jews, save yourself.”

The fifteenth title is “The crucified Christ is mocked,” with the following parallel texts:
1.       The passersby jeered him; they shook their heads and said, “Aha! So you who would destroy the Temple and rebuild it in three days (v. 30)! Then save yourself and come down from the cross” (v.  31). The chief priests, with the scribes, mocked him among themselves in the same way. “He saved others, ’they said he cannot save himself (v.32). Let the Christ, the King of Israel, come down now from the cross that we may see and believe.”(v. 32a).

2.       The people stayed there watching him. As for the leaders, they jeered at him. “He saved others,’ they said ‘let him save himself if he is the Christ of God,  the Chosen One (v. 35).” The soldiers mocked him too, and when they approached to offer him vinegar(v. 36), they said, “If you are king of the Jews, save yourself (v. 37).

Verses 39 to 42 say: The passersby jeered at him; they shook their heads and said, “So you who would destroy the Temple and rebuild it in three days! Then save yourself! If you are the Son of God, come down from the cross!” The chief priests with the scribes and elders mocked him in the same way. “He saved others’ they said ‘he cannot save himself. He is the king of Israel; let him come down from the cross now, and we will believe in him.

Parallel texts are:
1.       Ps 22:7…all who see me jeer at me, they toss their heads and sneer…
2.       Jr 18:16 - They will make their country desolate, everlastingly derided: every passer-by will be appalled at it and shake his head.
3.       Lm 2:15 All who pass your way clap their hands at the sight; they whistle and shake their heads over the daughter of Jerusalem. ‘Was this the loveliest of all,h this, the joy of the whole world?’ Footnote h  says “Text corr.; Hebr. ‘Is this the city that was called the loveliest’.”
4.       Mt 26:61- and made a statement, “This man said, ‘I have power to destroy the Temple of God and in three days build it up s.’” (v. 61).
Footnote s

Verse 43 says: He puts his trust in God; now let God rescue him if he wants him. For he did say, ‘I am the son of God”’.
Parallel texts for verse 43 are:
1.       Ps 22:8 - He relied on Yahweh, let Yahweh save him! If Yahweh is his friend, let Him rescue him!’
2.       Ws 2:18-20 - If the virtuous man is the God’s son, God will take his part and rescue him from the clutches of his enemies.

Verse 44 says: Even the robbers who were crucified with him taunted him in the same way.

Sixteenth title is  “The death of Jesus”, with the following parallel texts:
1.       Mk 15:33-41 - When the sixth hour came there was darkness over the whole land until the ninth  hour (v.33) And at the ninth hour  Jesus cried out in a loud voice, “Eloi, Eloi,d lama sabachthani?” which means, “My God, my God, why have you deserted me?’ (v. 34) When some of those who stood by heard this, they said, “Listen, he is calling on Elijah (v.35). Someone ran and soaked a sponge in vinegar and, putting it on a reed, gave it to him to drink, saying, “Wait and see if Elijah will come to take him down (v. 36). But Jesus gave a loud cry and breathed his last (v. 37).  And the veil of the Temple was torn in two from top to bottom (v. 38). The centurion, who was standing in front of him, had seen how he had died, and he said, ‘In truth this man was a son of God’ (v. 39)e.  There were some women watching from a distance. Among them were Mary of Magdala. Mary who was the mother of James the younger and Joset, and Salome.f(v. 40). These used to follow him and look after him when he was in Galilee. And there were many other women there who had come up to Jerusalem with him (v. 41). Footnote d says “Jesus must have used the Aramaic Elahi: the transliteration Eloi has probably been influenced by the Hebr. Elohim.”; Footnote e says “For the Roman officer, this admission would not have its full Christian content, but Mk clearly sees in it a pagan’s acknowledgement that Jesus was more than a man.”; and Footnote f  says “Probably the woman whom Mt (27:56) calls ‘the mother of the sons of Zebedee’.”
2.       Lk 23:44-49 - It was now about the sixth hour and, with the sun eclipsed, a darkness came over the whole land until the ninth hour (v. 44). The veil of the Temple was torn right down the middle (v.45); and when Jesus had cried out in a loud voice, he said, ‘Father, into your hands I commit my spirit’. With these words he breathed his last (v. 46). When the centurion saw what had taken place, he gave praise to God and said, ‘This was a great and good man’ (v. 47). And when all the people who had gathered for the spectacle saw what had happened, they went home beating their breasts (v. 48). All his friends stood at a distance; so all did the women who accompanied him from Galilee, and they saw all this happen (v. 49).

Verses 45 and 46 say: From the sixth hour there was darkness over all the land until  the ninth hourr. And about ninth hour, Jesus cried out in a loud voice, “Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani?” that is, “My God, my God, why have you deserted me?”s Footnote r  says “From noon to three in the afternoon.”; and Footnote s says “A cry of real distress but not of despair: this lament which Jesus takes from the scriptures is a prayer to God and is followed in the Psalm by an expression of joyful confidence in final victory.”

Parallel text for verse 46 is Ps 22:1 that says: My God, my God, why have you deserted me? How far from saving me, the words I groan!

Verses 47 and 48 say: When some of the those who stood there heard this, they said, “The man is calling on Elijaht and one of them quickly ran to get a sponge which he dipped in vinegaru, and putting it on a reed, gave it to him to drink …Footnote t  says “Malicious play on words based on the expectation of Elijah as the Messiah’s precursor, cf. 17:10-13+.”; and Footnote u says “Sour drink of the Roman soldier. Probably the gesture was sympathetic, cf. Jn 19:28f; the Synoptics regard it as malevolent (Lk 23:36) and describe it in terms that recall Ps 69:21.
Parallel texts are:
1.       Lk 23:36 - The soldiers mocked him too, and when they approached to offer him vinegar.
2.       Jn 19:29 - A jar full of vinegar stood there, so putting a sponge soaked in eth vinegar on a hyssop stickm they held it up to his mouth. Footnote m says “Conj. ‘on a spear’.”

Verses 49 and 50 say: ‘Wait,’ said the rest of them ‘let us see if Elijah comes to save him.” But Jesus, again crying out in a loud voice, yielded up his spirit.

Parallel text for verse 49 is Ps 69:21 that says: They gave me poison to eat instead, when I was thirsty they gave me vinegar to drink.

Verses 51, 52 and 53 say: At that, the veil of the Templev  was torn in two from top to bottom; the earth quaked; rocks were split;w. The tombs opened, and the bodies of many holy man rose from the dead, and these, after his resurrection, came out of the tombs, entered the Holy City and appeared to number of people.  Footnote v says “Either the curtain which hung in front of the Holy Place from the Holy of Holies, cf. Ex 26:31f. Following Heb9:12; 10:20, Christian tradition saw in this tearing of the veil the abrogation of the old Mosaic cult and the way opened up by Christ into the messianic sanctuary.”; and Footnote w says “This remarkable phenomena, like the darkness mentioned in v. 45, were foretold by the prophets as unmistakable sign of the ‘days of Yahweh’, cf. Am 8:9+.”

Parallel texts for verse 51 are:
1.       Heb 6:19 - Here we have an anchor for our soul,g as sure as it is firm, and reaching right through beyond the veil. Footnote  g says “Anchor: symbol of stability in the classical world, adopted in Christian iconography of 2nd c. as a symbol of hope.”
2.       1 P 3:19 - And in the spirit, he went to the spirits in prisonh. Footnote h says “Probably alludes to the descent of Christ to Hades, cf. Mt. 16:18+, between his death and resurrection, Mt. 12:40; Ac. 2:24.31; Rm. 10:7; Ep. 4:9; Heb. 13:20. He went there ‘in spirit’, cf. Lk. 23:46, or (better) ‘according to the spirit’, Rm. 1:4+, his ‘flesh’ being dead on the cross, Rm. 8:3f. The ‘spirits in prison’ to whom he ‘preached’ (or proclaimed) salvation are identified by some writers are the chained demons mentioned in the Book of Enoch (some texts are corrected so as to make Enoch, and not Christ, preach to them). This spirits have thus been put under the authority of Christ as Kyrios v. 22, cf. Ep. 1:21f; Ph. 2:8-10; and this subjection to him is to be confirmed later on, 1 Co. 15:24f. Other writers suggest these the spirits of people who were drowned in the Flood as a punishment but who are now summoned by God’s ‘patience’ to eternal life’, cf. 4:6. Mt. 27:52f is a similar episode of liberation by Christ between his death and resurrection, only here it is the saints, the holy ones who were waiting for him, that are liberated, cf. Heb. 11:39f, 12:23; and are given the freedom of the holy (the heavenly) city. The descent of Christ to Hades is one of the articles in the Apostle’s Creed.”

Verse 54 says: Meanwhile, the centurion, together with others guarding Jesus, had seen the earthquake and all that was taking place, and they were terrified and said, “In truth this was the Son of God!”.

Parallel texts are:
1.       Mt 4:3 - and the tempter came and said to him, ‘If you are the Son of God,c tell these stones to turn into loaves’. Footnote c says “The biblical title ‘Son of God’ does not necessarily mean natural sonship but may imply a sonship which is merely adoptive, i.e., which as a result of God’s deliberate choice sets up a very intimate relationship between God and his creature. In this sense the title is given to angels (Jb. 1:6), to the Chosen People (Ex. 4:22, Ws. 18:13), to individual Israelites (Dt. 14:1, Ho. 2:1, cf. Mt. 5:9,48, etc.), to their leaders (Ps. 82:6). Were therefore it is attributed to the royal Messiah (1 Ch. 17:13, Ps. 2:7, 89:26) it does not necessarily imply that he is more than man; nor need we suppose that it has any deeper significance when used by Satan (Mt. 4:3,6) or by the possessed (Mk. 3:11, 5:7, Lk. 4:41), still less when used by the centurion (Mk. 15:39, cf. Lk. 23:47). By itself the sentence at baptism (Mt. 3:17) and at the transfiguration (17:5) suggests no more than the divine predilection for the Messiah-servant, and all probability the High priest’s question (26:63) concerns messiahship only. Nevertheless the title ‘Son of God’ can bear a further, more profound meaning of sonship in the full sense of the word. Jesus clearly insinuated this meaning when he spoke of himself as ‘the Son’ (2:37), ranked above the angels (24:36), having God for his ‘Father’ in a way others had not (Jn. 20:17 and cf. ‘my Father’ in Mt. 7:21, etc.), enjoying with the Father an altogether singular relationship of knowledge and love (Mt. 11:27). These assertions, coupled with others that speak of the Messiah’s divine rank (22:42-46), of the heavenly origin of the ‘son of  man’ (8:20+), assertions finally confirmed by the triumph of the resurrection, have endowed the expression ‘son of God’ with the strictly divine significance which will later be found, e.g. in Paul (Rm. 9:5+). During the lifetime of Christ, it is true his disciples had no clear conception of his divinity – the texts of Mt. 14:33 and 16:16 which add the title ‘Son of God’ to the more primitive text of Mk reflect, in all probability, a later stage in the faith’s development. But it is equally true that Jesus expressed with his own lips and with as much clarity as his audience could support, his own consciousness of being Son of the Father in the fullest sense. On these historical utterances the faith of the disciples rested, a faith that reached its perfection after the resurrection with the help of the Holy Spirit.”
2.       Mk 15:39 - The centurion, who was standing in front of him, had seen how he had died, and he said, “In  this man was a son of God!”e Footnote e says “For the Roman officer, this admission would not have its full Christian content, but Mk clearly sees in it a pagan’s acknowledgement that Jesus was more than man”.
3.       Lk 8:2-3…as well as certain women who had been cured of evil spirits and ailments: Mary, surnamed the Magdalene, from whom seven demons had gone out (v. 2). Joanna, the wife of Herod’s steward Chuza, Susanna, and many others who provided for them out of their own resources (v. 3).
4.       Jn 19:25 - Near the cross of Jesus stood his motherj and his mother’s sister,k Mary the wife of Clopas, and Mary of Magdala.

Footnote

Verses 55 and 56 say: And many women were there, watching from a distance, the same women who had followed Jesus from Galilee, and looked after him. Among them were Mary Magdalene and Mary the mother of James and Joseph, and the mother of Zebedee’s sons.

Parallel text for verse 55 is Mt 13:55 that says: This is the carpenter’s son, surely? Is not his mother the woman called Mary, and his brothers James and Joseph and Simon and Jude?

Seventeenth title is “The burial”, with the following parallel texts:
1.       Mk 15:42-47 - It was now evening, and since it was the Preparation Day (that is, the vigil of the Sabbath) (v. 42), there came Joseph of Arimathea, a prominent member of the Council,g who himself lived in the hope of seeing the kingdom of God, came and courageously went to Pilate and asked for the body of Jesus (v. 43). Pilate, astonished that he shouldhave  died so soon, summoned the centurion and inquired if he was already deadh (v.44). Having been assured of this by the centurion, he granted the corpse to Joseph (v.45), who bought a shroud, took Jesus down from the cross, wrapped him in the shroud and laid him in a tomb which had been hewn out of the rock. He then rolled a stone against the entrance to the tomb (v.46). Mary Magdalene and Mary the mother of Joses were watching and took note of where he was laid (v.47). Footnote  g says “i.e. the Sanhedrin.”; and  Footnote h says “Var. ‘if he had been dead for some time.’
2.       Lk 23:50-55 - Then a member of the council arrived, an upright and virtuous man named Joseph (v. 50). He had not consented to what the others had planned and carried out. He came from Arimathea, a Jewish town, and he lived in the hope of  seeing the kingdom of God (v. 51).This man went to Pilate and asked for the body of Jesus (v. 52). He then took it down, wrapped it in a shroud and put him in a tomb  hewn in a rock in which no one had yet been laid (v. 53). It was Preparation Day  and the sabbath was imminent (v. 54). Meanwhile the women who had come from Galilee with Jesus were following behind. They took note of the tomb and the position of the body (v. 55).
3.       Jn 19:18-42 - After this, Joseph of Arimathea, who was  a disciple of Jesus-though a secret one because he was afraid of the Jews- asked Pilate to let him remove the body of Jesus. Pilate gave permission, so theyw came and took it away (v.38). Nicodemus came as well- the same one who had first come to Jesus at night-time-and he brought a mixture of myrrh and aloes, weighing about one hundred pounds (v. 39) They took the body of Jesus and wrapped it with the spices in linen cloth, following the Jewish burial custom (v.40). At the place where he had been crucified, there was a garden, and in this garden a new tomb, in which no one had yet been buried (v.41). Since it wasJewish  Day of Preparation and the tomb was near at hand, they laid Jesus there (v. 42).  Footnote  w  says “Var ‘he’”

Verses 57, 58, 59, 60 and 61 say: When it was evening, there came a rich man of Arimathea, called Joseph, who had himself become a disciple of Jesus.  This man went to Pilate and asked for the body of Jesus. Pilate thereupon ordered it to be handed over. Joseph took the body, wrapped it in clean shroud and put it in his new tomb which he had hewn out of the rock. He then rolled a large stone across the entrance of the tomb and went away. Now Mary Magdalene and the other Mary were there, sitting opposite the sepulcher.

Parallel text for verse 59 is Is 53:9 that says: They gave him a grave with the wicked, a tomb with the richg, though he had done no wrong, and there had been no perjury in his mouth . Footnote  g says “With DSIa, Hebr. ‘in his death he is with the rich man’. Early Christian preaching seems to have had this text in mind when recording the burial of Jesus in the tomb of Joseph Arimathea, ‘a rich man’, Mt 27:57-60. It is possible to correct to ‘in his death he is with the evil-doers’, Lk. 22:37 which, however, refers rather to v. 12.”

Eighteenth title is  “The guard at the tomb.”

Verses 62 to 66 say: Next day, that is, when Preparation Dayx was over, the chief priests and the Pharisees went in a body to Pilate and said to him, ‘Your Excellency, we recall that this imposter said, while he was still alive, “After three days I shall rise again”.  Therefore give the order to have the sepulcher kept secure until the third day, for fear his disciples come and steal him away and tell the people, “He has risen from the dead”. The last piece of fraud would be worse than what went before.’ ‘You may have your guard’y said Pilate to them. ‘Go and make all as secure as you know how.’ So they went and made the sepulcher secure, putting seals on the stone and mounting a guard. Footnote x says “Greek parakeue (‘preparation’) meaning Friday, i.e. the day when preparations were made for the Sabbath.”; and Footnote y says “Lit. ‘You have a guard’, i.e., I now put one at your disposal.”

Parallel texts for verse 64 are:
1.       Mt 16:21 - From that timek, Jesus began to make clear to his disciples that he was destined to go to Jerusalem and suffer grievously at the hands of the elders, and chief priests and scribes, to be put to death and to  be raised on the third day. Footnote k says “Jesus has just elicited from his disciples the first explicit profession of faith in him as Messiah. At this crucial moment he tells them for the first time of his coming Passion: he is not only the glorious Messiah, he is also the suffering servant. Within the next few days this teaching method will be pursued in a similar situation: the glorious transfiguration will be followed by an injunction to silence and a prediction of Passion, 17:1-12. It is Christ’s way of bracing the disciples’ faith for the approaching crisis of death and resurrection.”
2.       Jn 7:12 - People stood in groups whisperingf about him. Some said, ‘He is a good man’; others, ‘No, he is leading the people astray’. Footnote f says “Lit. ‘There was whispering (var. much whispering) about him in the crowds’.”
3.       Ac 10:40…yet three days afterwards God raised him to lifem and allowed him to be seen… Footnote m  says “Lit. ‘raised him on the third day’; stereotype formula of the Christian preaching and faith. It appears as early as 1 Co. 15:4 (a first stage of the creed) with the addition ‘according to the scriptures’. The formula echoes Jon 2:1 (cf. Mt 12:40): see also Ho 6:2. It recurs in Mt 16:21; 17:23; 20:19; 27:64; Lk 9:22; 18:33; 24:7,46.”

The First Reading is taken from Is 50:4-7.

Verse 4 says: The Lord Yahweh has given me a disciple’s tongue. So that I may know how to replyc  to the wearied he provides me with speech. Each morning he wakes me to hear, to listen like a disciple.

Parallel is Jn 3:11 that says: Amen, amen, I say to you, we speak of what we know and we testify to what we have seen, but you people do not accept our testimony.

Verse 5 says: The Lord GOD opened my ear;d I did not refuse, did not turn away. Footnoted  says“The servant, cf. 42:1+, is here not so much a prophet as a sage inspired by Yahweh.”

Parallel texts are:
  1. Ps 40:6 - You, who wanted no sacrifice or oblation, openedb my ear, you asked no holocaust or sacrifice for sin; then I said, ‘Here I am! I am coming!”Footnote b  says “Lit ‘dug out’. God sees to it that his servant knows his will, cf. Is 50:5. A Greek variant, ‘you have fashioned a body for me, was interpreted messianically and applied to Christ, Heb 10:5.”
  2. Is 52:-53:12 - Fourth Song of the Servant of Yahwehk See, my servant shall prosper, he shall be lifted up, exalted, rise to great heights (v. 13).As the crowds were appalled on seeing himl, so disfigured did he look that he seemed no longer humanm(v. 14),So will the crowds be astonished at himn, and kings stand speechless before him; for they shall see something never told and witness something never heard before (v. 15); Who could believe what we have heard and to whom has the power of Yahweh revealed? (Chapter 23, v. 1). He grew up in front of usa like a shootb in arid ground; without beauty, without majesty (we saw him), no looks to attract our eyes (v. 2), a thing despised and rejected by men, a man of sorrows and familiar with suffering, a man to make people screen their facesc; he was despised and we took no account of him (v. 3). And yet ours were the sufferings he bore, ours the sorrows he carried. But we, we thought of him as someone punished, struck by God, and brought low (v. 4).Yet he was pierced through for our faults, crushed for our sins. On him lies a punishment that brings us peace, and through his wounds we are healed (v. 5). We had all gone astray like sheep, each taking his own way; and Yahweh burdened him with the sins of us all(v. 6). Harshly dealt with, he bore it humbly, he never opened his mouth, like a lamb that is led to the slaughterhouse, like a sheep dumbed before its shearers, never opening his mouth (v. 7). By force and by law, he was takend, would anyone plead his cause? Yet, he was torn away from the land of the living; for ourf faults struck down in death (v.8).They gave him a grave with the wicked, a tomb with the richg, though he had done no wrong, and there had been no perjury in his mouth (v.9). Yahweh had been pleased to crush him with sufferingh. If he offers his life in atonement, he shall see his heirs, he shall have a long life, and through him what Yahweh wishes will shall be done(v.10).His soul’s anguish over he shall see the light;I and be content;j By his sufferings shall my servant  justify many, taking their faults on himself (v. 11). Hence I will great whole hordes his tributes, he shall divide the spoil with the mighty, for surrendering himself to death, and letting himself be taken for a sinner while he was bearing the faults of many, and praying all the time for sinners (v.12). Footnote k  says “On the meaning of this song, cf. 42:1+. The poem is apparently in dialogue form. First Yahweh delivers an oracle, v. 13, then the kings of the nation speak, vv. 14 f, and next the people; the poem ends with a further oracle, 53:11-12. It is difficult to decide, however, precisely where the speaker changes.”; Footnote l says  ‘On seeing him’ Targ, and Syr.; ‘on seeing you’ Hebr.; Footnote m  says “A DSIa variant suggests the translation ‘By my anointing I took his human appearance from him;’ Footnote n says ‘will be astonished’ following Greek and Lat.; ‘he will come to leap’ Hebr.; Is 53:1 -12; Footnote  a  says “‘in front of us’ corr,; ‘in front of him’ Hebr.; Footnote b  says “In 11:1,10, Immanuel is a ‘root’. Footnote c says “The expression was used of lepers.; Footnote d  says “Suggesting that the servant has been condemned by process of law; Footnote e  says ‘cause’ corr.; ‘generation’, ‘descent’ Hebr. Interpretation uncertain. The ‘who will explain his descent?’ of the Greek and Lat. Has been taken by Christian tradition to refer to the mysterious origin of Christ; the Hebr. dor( a generation) cannot however bear this sense. Footnote f  says ‘our’ corr.; ‘of my people’ Hebr. Footnote g  says “With DSIa, Hebr. ‘in his death he is with the rich man’. Early Christian preaching seems to have had this text in mind when recording the burial of Jesus in the tomb of Joseph Arimathea, ‘a rich man’, Mt 27:57-60. It is possible to correct to ‘in his death he is with the evil-doers’, Lk. 22:37 which, however, refers rather to v. 12. Footnote h  says ‘with suffering’ corr., cf. versions; ‘he has pierced him’ DSIa, cf. v. 5.; Footnote I says “‘the light’ Greek, DSIa and DSIb; absent from Hebr.; Footnote j  says ‘By his suffering’ corr. following one  Hebr. MS; ‘By his knowledge’ Hebr. Before ‘servant’ Hebr. inserts ‘the just one’.

Verse 6 says: I gave my back to those who beat me, my cheeks to those who tore out my beard; My face I did not hide from insults and spitting.e Footnote  e  says “The description of the servant’s suffering recurs in the fourth song, 52:13-53:12.”

Verse 7 says: The Lord GOD is my help, therefore I am not disgraced; Therefore I have set my face like flint, knowing that I shall not be put to shame.

Parallel texts are:
  1. Ezk 3:8-9 - But now I will make you as defiant as they are, and as obstinate as they are; I am going to make your resolutions as hard as diamond, and diamond is harder than flint. So, do not be afraid of them, do not be overwhelmed by them, for they are a set of rebels (vv. 8-9).
  2. Ps 25:3 - No, those who hope in you are never shamed, shame awaits disappointed traitors.

The Second Reading is from Phil 2:6-11.

Verse 6 says: His state was divine,e  yet he did not cling to his equality with Godf . Footnote e - Lit. ‘Who subsisting in the form of God’: here ‘form’ means all the attributes that express and reveal the essential ‘nature’ of God; Christ, being God, had all the divine prerogatives by right; and Footnote f says “Lit. ‘did not deem being on an equality with God as something to grasp’ or ‘hold on to’. This refers not to his equality by nature ‘subsisting in the form of God’, and which Christ could not have surrendered, but to his being publicly treated and honored as equal to God which was a thing that Jesus (unlike Adam, Gn 3:5,22, who wanted to be seen to be like God) could and did give up in his human life.”

Parallel texts  are:
  1. Jn 1:1 - In the beginning was the Word,athe Word was with God and the Word was God (v . 1). He was in the beginning with God (v.2).Footnotea says “The O.T. speaks of the Word of God, and of his wisdom, present with God before the world was made, cf. Pr. 8:22+; Ws. 7:22+, by it all things were created, it is sent to earth to reveal the hidden designs of God; it returns to him with its work done, Is. 58:10-11, Pr. 8:22-36, Si. 24:3-22, Ws. 9:9-12.  On its creature role, cf. also Gn. 1:3,6 etc.: Is 40:8,26, 44:24-28; 48:13, Ps. 33:6, Jdt. 16:14, Si.42:15; on its mission, cf. Ws. 18:14-16, Ps.107:20; 147:15-18.  For John, too, 13:3, 16:28, the Word existed before the world in God, 1:1-2, 8:24+, 10:30+. It has come on earth, 1:9-14, 3:19, 12:46, cf. Mk 1:38+, being sent by the Father; 3:17,34,5:36, 43, 6:29, 7:29, 8:42, 9:7, 10:36, 11:42, 17:3,25,cf. Lk 4:43, to perform a task, 4:34+, namely, to deliver 3:11+, 8:21, 12:35, 13:3, 16:5, 17:11, 13, 20:17.  The incarnation enabled the N.T. and especially John, to see this separately and eternally existent Word-Wisdom as a person.”


  1. Jn 17:5 - Now, Father, it is time to glorify me with the glory I had with youf before ever the world was.Footnotef  says“Var. ‘the glory which was with you’ or ‘the glory with which I was’ or ‘the glory with you’.
  2. Col 1:15-20 - Christ is the head of all creatione He is the image of the unseen God, and the firstborn of all creation (v. 15), for him were created all things in heaven and on earth: everything visible and everything invisible, Thrones, Dominations, Sovereignties, Powers - all things were created through him and for him (v. 16). Before anything was created, he existed, and he holds all things in unity (v.17). Now the church is his body, he is the head, f As he is the Beginning, he was first to be born from the dead, so that he should be first in every way(v.18). Because God wanted all perfection to be found in himg(v. 19), and all things to be reconciled through him and for him,h everything in heaven and everything on earth,i when he made peace by his death on the cross ( v. 20).Footnote e  says “In this poem Paul introduces two ways in which can claim to be the ‘head’ of everything that exists:1. He is the head of creation, of all that exists naturally, vv. 15-17; 2. He is head of the new creation and all that exists supernaturally through having been saved, vv. 18-20. The subject of the poem is the pre-existent Christ, but considered only in so far as he is manifest in the unique historic person that is the Son of God made man, cf. Ph 2:5+. It is as the incarnate God that Jesus is the ‘image of God’, i.e. his human nature was the visible manifestation of God who is invisible, cf. Rm 8:29+, and it is as such, in this concrete human nature, and as part of creation, that Jesus is called the ‘first born of creation’ - not in the temporal sense of having been born first, but in the sense of having been given the first place of honor.”; Footnote f says “On the church a Christ’s body, cf. 1 Co. 12:12f, he is called the ‘head’ of his own body both in a temporal sense (v. 18, i.e., he was the first to rise from the dead) and in a spiritual sense (v. 20, i.e. he is the leader of all the saved).”; Footnote g  says“Lit. ‘because (God) wanted the pleroma to dwell in him”. The exact meaning of the word ‘pleroma’ (i.e. the thing that fills up a gap or hole, like a patch, cf. Mt. 9:16) is not certain here. Some writers have thought it must mean the same as in 2:9 (the fullness of divinity that filled Jesus) but since vv. 15-18 have already dealt with the divinity of Jesus, it seems likely that the reference here is to the biblical concept of the entire cosmos as filled with the creative presence of God, cf. Is. 6:3, Jr. 23:24, Ps. 24:1, 50:12, 72:19, Ws. 1:7, Sir. 43:27, etc. The concept was also widespread in the Graeco-Roman world. Paul teaches that the incarnation and resurrection make Christ head not only of the entire human race, but of the entire created universe (cosmos), so that everything that was involved in the fall is equally involved in salvation, cf. Rm. 8:19-23, 1 Co. 3:22f, 15:20-28, Ep. 1:10, 4:10, Ph. 2:10f., 3:2f, Heb. 2:5-8, Cf. 2:9+.; Footnote  h says“i.e. through and for  Christ, cf. the parallel ‘though him and for him’ of v. 16. Alternatively, it could read “God wanted everything…to be reconciled to himself, though him who made peace…’ cf. Rm 5:10; 2 Co 5:18f.”; and Footnote i  says “This reconciliation of the whole universe (including angels as well as human beings) means not that every single individual will be saved, but that all who are saved will be saved by their collective return to the right order and peace of perfect submission to God. Any individual who do not join this new creation through grace will be forced to join it, cf. 2:15; 1 Co 15:24-25 (the heavenly spirits) and 2 Th 1:8-9; 1 Co 6:9-10; Ga. 5:21; Rm 2:8; Ep 5:5 (men).”

  1. Heb 1:3 - He is the radiant light of God’s glory and the perfect copy of his nature,c sustaining the universe by his powerful command; and now that he has destroyed the defilement of sin, he has gone to take his place in heaven at the right hand of divine Majesty. Footnotec  says  “These two metaphors are borrowed from the Sophia and logos theologies of Alexandria, Ws 7:25-26; they express both the identity of nature between Father and Son, and the distinction of person. The Son is the brightness, the light shining from its source, which is the bright glory, cf. Ex. 24:16+, of the Father (‘Light from Light’). He is also the replica, cf. Col 1:15+, of the Father’s substance, like an exact impression made by a seal on clay or wax, cf. Jn 14:9.”

Verse 7  says: but emptied himselfg to assume the condition of a slave,h and became as men arei; Footnote g  says ‘He emptied himself’; this is not so much a reference to the fact of the incarnation, as to the way it took place. What Jesus freely gave up was not his divine nature, but the glory to which his divine nature entitled him, and which had been his before the incarnation, Jn 17:5, and, which ‘normally’ speaking would have been observable in his human body (cf. the transfiguration, Mt 17:1-8). He voluntarily deprived himself of this so that it could be returned to him by the Father, cf. Jn 8:50,54, after his sacrifice, vv.9-11.”; Footnote h says ‘slave’ as opposed to ‘Kyrios’ v. 11, cf. Ga 4:1; Col 3:22f. Christ as man led a life of submission and humble obedience, v. 8. This is probably a reference to the ‘servant’ of Is 52:13-53:12, cf. Is 42:1.; and Footnote i says “Not just ‘a human being’ but a human being ‘like others’; sharing all the weaknesses of the human condition apart from sin.”

Parallel texts  are:
  1. 2 Co 8:9 - Remember how generous the Lord Jesus was:b  he was rich, but he became poor for your sake, to make you rich out of his poverty. Footnote b  says“Lit. ‘the generosity (or perhaps ‘grace’) of the Lord Jesus’.”
  2. Rv 5:12 - …shouting, ‘The Lamb that was sacrificed is worthy to be given power, riches,i wisdom and strength, honor and glory and blessing.’ Footnote i  says“Vulg. ‘divinity.’
  3. Mt 20:28…just as the Son of Man came not to be served but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom g for many.h’ Footnote g says “ By sin man incurs, as a debt to the divine justice, the punishment of death demanded by the Law, cf. 1 Co. 15:56; 2 Co. 3:7,9; Ga. 3:13; Rm. 8:3-4, with notes. To ransom them from this slavery of sin and death, Rm. 3:24+. Christ is to pay the ransom and discharge the debt with the price of his blood, 1 Co. 6:20; 7:23; Ga. 3:13; 4:5, with notes, By thus dying in place of the guilty, he fulfills the prophesied function of the ‘servant of Yahweh’ (Is. 53). The Hebr. word translated ‘many’, Is. 53:11f, contrast the enormous crowd of the redeemed with the one Redeemer: it does not imply that the number of redeemed is limited, Rm. 5:6-21. Cf. Mt. 26:28+.”; and Footnote h says “At this point some authorities insert the following passage, derived probably from some apocryphal gospel ‘But as for you, from littleness you seek to grow great and from greatness you make yourselves small. When you are invited to a banquet do not take one of the places of honor, because someone more important than you may arrive and then the steward will have to say, “Move down lower”, and you would be covered with confusion. Take the lowest place, and then if someone less important than you comes in, the steward will say to you, “Move up higher”, and that will be to your advantage.’ Cf. Lk. 14:8-10.”
  4. Rm 8:3 - God has done what the Law, because of our unspiritual nature, was unable to do.c God dealt with sin by sending his own Son in a body as physical as any sinful body, and in that bodyd God condemned sin. Footnote c  says “The mosaic Law, imposed from without, could not be an inward principle of salvation, 7:7+. Christ alone, who by his death destroyed our unspiritual nature (lit. ‘flesh’) in his own person, could destroy sin whose domain the ‘flesh’ was. Man formerly carnal is now, though union with Christ, spiritual”; Footnote d says “Lit. ‘in the likeness of sinful flesh and in that flesh…
  5. Ga 4:4 - But when the appointed time c came, God sent his son, born of a woman, born a subject of the Law. Footnote c  says “Lit. ‘fullness of time’; the phrase indicates how when the messianic age comes it will fill a need felt for centuries, rather like filling up a jug. Cf. Ac 1:7+ and Mk 1:15; 1 Co 10:11; Ep 1:10; Heb 1”2; 9:26; 1 P 1:20.”
  6. Heb 2:17 - It was essential that he should in this way become completely like his brothers so  that he could be a compassionate  and trustworthy high priest of God’s religion, able to atone for human sins

Verse 8  says: and being as all men are,j he was humbler yet, even to accepting death, death on a cross
Footnotej- says“Lit. ‘And in fashion found as man’.”

Parallel texts  are:
  1. Is 49:4 - While I was thinking,‘I have toiled in vain, I have exhausted myself for nothing, and all the while my cause was with Yahweh, my reward with my God.
  2. 1 P 5_6 - Bow down, then before the power of God now, and he will raise you up on the appointed day;gFootnote g says “Add (Vulg.) ‘of the coming;’, cf. 2:12”.
  3. Mt 26:39 - And going on a little further he fell on his face and prayed. ‘My Father,’ he said ‘if it is possible, let this cup pass me by. Nevertheless, let it be as you, not I, would have it’nFootnoten  says “Jesus feels the full ‘force of the human fear of death; he feels the instinctive urge to escape, gives expression to it and then stifles it by his acceptance of the Father’s will.”
  4. Rm 5:19 -As by one man’s disobedience many were made sinners, so by one man’s obedience many will be made righteous.mFootnotem says “Not only at the Last Judgment (for Paul regards justification as a present condition, cf. 5:1, etc.)’ but progressively as each individual becomes reborn in Christ.”
  5. Heb 5:8 - Although he was Son, he learnt to obey through suffering.
  6. Heb 12:2 - Let us not lose sight of Jesus, who leads us in our faith and brings it to perfection: for the sake of the joy which was still in the future, he endured the cross, disregarding the shamefulness of it, and from now on has taken his place at the right hand of God’s throne.

Verse 9  says: But God raised him highk and gave him the namel which is above all other namesm Footnotek says “Lit ‘super-raised him’; by the resurrection and ascension”; Footnote lsays “Named him ‘Lord’, v. 11; or, at a deeper level, gave him an ineffable and divine name which, through the triumph of the risen Christ, can now be expressed by the title Kyrios, Lord, cf. Ac 2:21; 3:16+.”; and Footnote m says “Greater even than the angels, cf. Ef 1:21; Heb 1:4; 1 P 3:22.”

Parallel texts  are:
  1. Is 52:13 - See, my servant shall prosper, he shall be lifted up, exalted, rise to great heights
  2. Mt 23:12 - Anyone who exalts himself will be humbled, and anyone who humbles himself will be exalted.
  3. Jn 10:17f - The Father loves me, because I lay down my life in order to take it up again
  4. Ep 1:20-23…at work  in Christ when he used it to raise him from the dead and to make him sit at his right hand, in heaven (v. 20), far above every Sovereignty, Authority, Power or Dominion,t or any other name that can be named, not only in this age but also in the age to come (v. 21) He has put all things under his feet, and made him, as the ruler of everything, the head of the Church (v. 22), which is his body, the fullness of him who fills the whole creationu (v. 23)Footnote t  says “Names traditional in Jewish literature for angelic hierarchies.”; and  Footnote u – Lit. ‘fills all in all’. The Church, as the body of Christ, 1 Co. 12:12f, can be called the fullness (pleroma); cf. Infra 3:19, 4:13) in so far as it includes the whole new creation that shares (since it forms the setting of the human race) in the cosmic rebirth under Christ its ruler and head, cf. Col. 1:15-20f. The adverbial phrase ‘all in all’ is used to suggest something of limitless size, cf. 1 Co. 6, 15:28, Col. 3:11.

Verse 10 says: so that all beings in the heavens, on earth and the underworld,nshould bend the knee at the name of Jesus…Footnoten says “The three cosmic divisions that cover the entire creation, cf. Rv 5:3,13.

Parallel texts  are:
  1. Ep 4:10 - The one who rose higher than all the heavens to fill all thingsg is not other than the one who descended. Footnote g  says “By ascending through all the cosmic spheres and taking possession of them all one after another, Christ became the head of the whole pleroma or total cosmos, 1:10+, and makes the entire universe acknowledge him as ‘Lord’; cf 1:20-23; Col 1:19; Ph 2:8-11.”
  2. Is 45:23 - By my own self, I swear it; what comes from my mouth is truth, a word irrevocable: before me  every knee shall bend, by me every tongue shall swear.
  3. Rm 14:11 - For scripture says: By my life- it is the Lord who speaks- every knee shall bend before me, and every tongue shall praise God.”

Verse 11 says that:  and that every tongue should acclaim o Jesus Christ as Lord, p to the glory of God the Father. q
Footnoteo  says“ Var. ‘and every tongue shall acclaim’”; p – Om. ‘Christ’. This proclamation is the essence of the Christian creed, Rm. 10:9, 1 Co. 12:3, cf. Col. 2:6. The use of Is. 45:23 (in which this homage is addressed to Yahweh himself) is a clear indication of the divine character that is meant to be understood by the title Kyrios, cf. Jn. 20:28, Ac. 2:36; and Footnoteq  says“Vulg. Interpretation is ‘proclaim that Jesus Christ is in the glory of God the Father’.”

Parallel texts  are:
  1. Ac 2:36 - For this reason the whole House of Israel can be certain that God has made this Jesus whom you crucified both Lord and Christ.
  2. Rm 1:4 - It is about Jesus Christ our Lord who is the order of the spirit, the spirit of holiness that is in him, was proclaimedc Son of God in all his power through his resurrection from the dead.dFootnote c  says “Vulg. ‘predestined’.; and Footnote d  says “For Paul Christ rose only because God raised him, 1 Th. 1:10; 1 Co. 6:14; 15:15; 2 Co. 4:14; Ga. 1:1; Rm. 4:24; 10:9; Ac. 2:24+; cf. 1 P. 1:21, thus displaying his ‘power’, 2 Cor. 13:4; Rm. 6:4; Ph. 3:10; Col. 2:12; Ep. 1:19f; Heb. 7:16;  and because God raised him to life through the Holy Spirit, Rm. 8:11. Christ is established in glory as Kyrios, Ph 2:9-11+; Ac 2:36; Rm 14:9, deserving anew, this time in virtue of his messianic work, the name he had from eternity, ‘son of God’, Ac 13:33, Heb 1:5; %:5. Cf. Rm 8:11+; 9:5+.”
  3. Rm 10:9 - If your lips confess that Jesus is Lord and if you believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, e then you will be saved.Footnote e  says “Profession of faith, such as is made at baptism, is the outward expression of the inward commitment of the ‘heart’.”
  4. 1 Co 12:3 - It is for that reason that I want you to understand that on the one hand no one can be speaking under the influence of the Holy Spirit and say, ‘Curse Jesus’, and on the other hand, no one can say, ‘Jesus is Lord’ unless he is under the influence of the Holy Spirit.
 While going through the exercise of preparing  this article, I was very much made aware of the murder of innocent people that went on since the beginning of human history and up to now. This concerns, in particular, the murder of the servants of the Most High, the prophets , beginning with Abel, Jeremiah, Zachariah son of Barachiah, John the Baptist, Jesus Christ, the Waldenses, the Annabaptists, the victims of the Inquisition, the Knight Templars, etc. These people have chosen the hard path to life by standing up for the truth and the murderous crowd have done the service of completing their work of witnessing to the truth by murdering all of them.